> i think it is confusing to deal with all those technologies for a newbie. > everything from jackrabbit to sling to jcr to osgi to launchpad to ujax. > some of this complexity is not necessary and can be removed easily. > i think the ujax / sling distinction can definitely go. i would basically > recommend to replace ujax with sling throughout the code, this > particularly includes the js side, and would graduate ujax into the > sling js library, which makes perfect sense to me. > > regarding r-u-microjax, and related acronyms, this was more making fun of > bad acronyms than anything else and i always hoped that someone > would come along with a better name, so i am more than happy to > just call it "sling". +1 ok for me
> > regards, > > david > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Tobias Bocanegra > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > doesn't the "Jax" refer to the mechanism how the form post is handled? > > it would at least call it 'sjax' > > > > regards, toby > > > > > > > > On 3/10/08, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Currently names used by Sling are prefixed with sling: with the > > > exception of well known parameters of the ujax servlets. To get all > > > these prefixes in line I suggest we change the prefix used by ujax > > > parameters to sling: > > > > > > WDYT ? > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Felix > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -----------------------------------------< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >--- > > Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel > > T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97 > > -----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >--- > > > -- -----------------------------------------< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >--- Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97 -----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >---
