Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
+1 to the proposed changes as well, and I'd suggest using "sling
client library" as the name for what was ujax, for use in docs, etc.
Hmm, I think if we use this in the docs, the module name should reflect
this.
... And also I really would like to see the name "Catapult" being used
somewhere in Sling, I don't think it makes sense to use it here. So lets
keep it for something better...
Catapult? Never heard that name before, but it sounds really cool ;-)
It might be that you never "heard" it before, but I guess you read it
somewhere :)
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
