Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 27.03.2008, 15:35 +0100 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 > > > > +1 to the proposed changes as well, and I'd suggest using "sling > > client library" as the name for what was ujax, for use in docs, etc. > Hmm, I think if we use this in the docs, the module name should reflect > this.
But then we should split what is now known as the sling/ujax module ? The Sling Client Library is just a single file - ujax.js (or now sling.js). Of course we may create single module for that, but I am not sure, whether this is worth it. Regards Felix > > > > >> ... And also I really would like to see the name "Catapult" being used > >> somewhere in Sling, I don't think it makes sense to use it here. So lets > >> keep it for something better... > > > > Catapult? Never heard that name before, but it sounds really cool ;-) > It might be that you never "heard" it before, but I guess you read it > somewhere :) > > Carsten
