hi, i just want to add, that most of the requests that actually hit sling will probably be plain .html requests with no selectors. so the /apps/foo/foo.jsp will probably resolve those requests. since requests that usually need selectors are image requests which are very good cacheable in a higher teer. so i don't think that in a real-live scenario, the resource resolution performance is that relevant. and of course it can easily be cached.
-- toby On 4/18/08, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix Meschberger wote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Am Freitag, den 18.04.2008, 16:35 +0200 schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > > > > > Having scripts in /apps and /libs where /libs has precendence of /apps > still feels not very intuitive for me. > > > > > > > It is the other way around: /apps has precedence over /libs. And this is > > IMHO intuitive. > > > > > Hehe, you see, it's not intuitive for me (ok, I'll write down 100 times > "apps has precedence over libs, apps has precedence over libs..." > > > Carsten > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
