how about that you may prefix the html.jsp (or pdf.jsp) with the last part of the resource path?
so foo.html.jsp is ok, but foo.html is not. allowing only this addition to circumvent the IDE problems is pretty easy to understand. -- toby On 4/26/08, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems that the longer we discuss the more possible suggestions we get - > that's not bad per se, but I start to wonder how we can reach consensus on > this? > > Now, I personally like the suggestion as outlined by Felix in the Jira > issue (using dots instead of paths), but on the other hand I agree with Tobi > that this might be bad for putting resources near the script. > > Well, on the other hand, it has been pointed out that the real issue is > just the fact that all scripts are named "htlm.*". I'm really not very > optimistic that the simple looking solution to duplicate the node name (or > whatever makes up the last node in the hierarchy) to get the file name is a > clear and simple concept. Telling people that they can write "foo.jsp" to > get html while they have to use "pdf.jsp" to get a pdf, seems very > complicated to explain and understand. And as I pointed out, as soon as you > are heavily using any other format than html, you end up with the same mess > (all files named pdf.*) > > So how do we want to proceed? > > > Carsten > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
