Hi, Give me 5 minutes, I am just now preparing a new summary of findings we had on a discussion this morning ;-)
Regards Felix Am Montag, den 28.04.2008, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:37 PM, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... i think that it is probably the easiest if toby and i come up with a > > proposal > > as an actual patch that suits our needs and experiences from a users > > perspective and meets the performance requirements, and then take > > this a basis for discussion... > > Agreed. > > > ... generally, i would like to keep this proposal backwards compatible to > > the current one, since there are only 2 or 3 that are broken and the > > rest is perfectly fine and suits the needs. keeping things backwards > > compatible also makes this a minor change and convenience improvement > > for current users.... > > Ok, I think we all agree the current way is not too bad, so if you can > come up with a proposal that improves it without going overboard > that's probably fine. > > I'm not too worried about performance, once again this stuff can > easily be cached, and if we need to recursively walk down under a path > like /apps/foo to find all potential scripts, that's usually only a > handful of files. > > -Bertrand
