More OT!!!
Do we really need sigs ? You can see who it is from the sender's address
anyway. I personally think sigs are overrated.
<!sig>
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Kennedy
Sent: Thursday, 24 February 2000 22:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SLUG] [Even Further OT] Alleged spam
> > If somebody was selling a 17" monitor for $200 on the list, I would
> > be scrumaging for more of their details and would be calling them at
> > work, etc :)
>
> Do you invite people to send you emails (even from this list) where the
> sole purpose is to sell something?? Isn't this uninvited?? It might not
> be unwelcome (but it could be that too), but it would certainly be
> uninvited.
> Make your choice, is unwanted/uninvited advertising spam or not??
>
> If it is, then nobody should EVER advertise anything for sale on this
> list, as that would be uninvited and possibly unwelcome to some.
Which is why most people advertising on the list add [Ad] or [Blatant Promo]
to the subject...
Or at least they should be... that has been the convention in the past.
Adam
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe in the text
