> Angus Lees wrote:
>
> the main reason i prefer it, is it seems to have better defaults than
> emacs. lots of little things are setup how i would anyway.
Hmm. Sounds like that other thing we like, but are afraid to mention.
> despite it being an "X" version, i keep being impressed with how well
> xemacs handles displaying the same buffer in both text/x.
Okay, imagine I was insane (read: inquisitive) enough to try it (you know,
next year, when it's finished downloading)...
Do GNU Emacs and XEmacs share any functionality at all? I know they're
different, and haven't been merged, but...
- Jeff
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------- http://linux.conf.au/ --
Ye shall be cursed to fall in love so easily, and yet be so
cold of heart as never to express it.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
