> It's bandwidth and traffic though... and it's all free for us, so we > shouldn't abuse it. Those lawyery bits are enough entropy-power for the > server, we don't need to add to it. ;) > > [ Everything on this list is multiplied by... Hmmm... 468 times. ] I don't suppose it would be worth adding a [---snip below here---] rule to the filtering software. I assume the attachments of legalese is simple done automatically, so if the poster to slug simple stuck this on the bottom of the email, and let the server at our end edit it for them automatically. This would save bandwidth, assuming it could be done. Jason -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments David Fisher
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Howard Lowndes
- Worse than that was: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachmen... Anand Kumria
- Re: Worse than that was: [SLUG] Lawyerly a... Howard Lowndes
- Re: Worse than that was: [SLUG] Lawye... Jeff Waugh
- Re: Worse than that was: [SLUG] L... Howard Lowndes
- Re: Worse than that was: [SLUG] L... DaZZa
- Re: Worse than that was: [SLUG] L... Michael
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Jason Rennie
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Terry Collins
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Michael Lake
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Jeff Waugh
- Re: [SLUG] Lawyerly attachments Anand Kumria
