On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 05:13, Pete Ryland wrote: > I think there was a change recently in mutt's default gpg config (under > debian at least). That could be part of the problem.
Pete, I seem to have trouble with your signatures, I think I've tried about five of your posts and only two have returned good. For instance, the first post you made to this thread came up with a good signature, but the post with the attached file came back bad. Does anyone else get bad signatures or this a problem at my end?
msg19269/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
