This one time, at band camp, Malcolm V wrote: >On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 05:13, Pete Ryland wrote: >> I think there was a change recently in mutt's default gpg config (under >> debian at least). That could be part of the problem. > >Pete, I seem to have trouble with your signatures, I think I've tried >about five of your posts and only two have returned good. For instance, >the first post you made to this thread came up with a good signature, >but the post with the attached file came back bad. > >Does anyone else get bad signatures or this a problem at my end?
Both your signatures are good from here. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg You created this list purely because you have so much to say that is too off topic for slug-chat, and too inoffensive for crackmonkey... didn't you? Admit it! -- Jan Schmidt, table64 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
