> and now they expect humans to read and write XML instead of lisp, and > think thats an improvement (grumble).
... and all the while "they" say things like, "but you can process XSL with XSL, and all of your XML tools, because it's XML too!" Except they say it seriously, with conviction. I mean, it's not like you can transform lisp with lisp (at runtime!), is it? Cough, cough. > alternatively, we could all just start using lisp now and skip the next > decade or so of language "development" ;) Dude, didn't you hear about the latest hip technology? Language skins make all the pain go away! - Jeff -- So, "Jeffrey" seems to mean "the ineffectual, victimised guy in American movies" in four different languages. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
