On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 18:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I haven't followed this thread so closely, > but have you tried win4lin?
Yeah. I tried it a few years back now. It worked really well. Ran a *lot* faster than vmware and didn't have massive disk images that filled up my disk. > > Not as good separation as vmware, but works > quite well I've heard. That's pretty accurate. I believe the reason it won't run the NT based kernels has something to do with handling of protected memory (ie, I think it just doesn't "do" protected memory. That makes it faster than VMWare because MMUing is easier). James. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
