** Reply to note from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin) Thu, 4 Sep 2003 01:58:00 +1000
> in all other instances i prefer POP as it's simpler and easier to work
> offline.
marty, thanks
that's what I was leaning towards. and, I suspect some of my users do not
have IMAP capable client app.
--------------------------------
oh, yes, and as to my earlier Qs 'does Squirel _need_ IMAP':
the reasons for my Qs was: I had a colleague who INSISTED he runs Squirel
with POP-ONLY,
just now, he admited had has IMAP that he didn't know of:
++++++++++++++++
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:31:37 +1100
VE
I double checked, we are in fact running IMAP - it runs under the INETD
process that's why I couldn't see it.
Happy for you to check things out.
Re: SquirelMail or sqwebmail ??
08:58 AM
** Reply to note from Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:19:58 +1100
> We're using squirrelmail - I've never heard of sqwebmail.
> No IMAP here, only POP3
++++++++++++++++
Voytek Eymont
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
