Why not to the check at DATA command yourself ? A
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:26:45PM +1100, Mary Gardiner wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004, David Kempe wrote: > > I have been steadily disabling secondary MXes for some time now. Its > > just a great way to attract spam - not an option when you net connection > > is not stable/permanent, but aside from that secondary MX just seems to > > be spam trap. > > Yes they are spam traps, however all domains that I'm secondary for > have had extended downtime combined with recipients who don't want to > wait three days for their mail, so I'm doing some people a favour and > being a secondary. > > As far as the original message goes, I'd probably refuse to secondary > for anyone who did SMTP rejects of spam and viruses -- this will tend to > mean that the secondary has to queue endless bounce messages because > most of the spam and an increasing number of viruses go through > secondaries. > > -Mary > -- > SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ > Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
