On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:20, Bolero wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I resend this email in text mode since somebody complaint about the
> first HTML version, which apparently could only be read in text mode
> incl. all formatting characters etc., additionally apparently loading
> your server unnecessarily due to HTML mode.
>
> I am new to Linux (RH C4) and after some weeks of stuffing around to get
> even the basics working, I am asking for help.

My advice is to ditch Red Hat.  When it works, it works like anything that 
works.  When it doesn't, it is too arcane to figure out and fix what isn't 
working.  Red Hat, for example, doesn't follow the common Linux approach of 
accepting kernel updates as a way to fix bugs, which is half of why kernels 
get updated.  Instead Red Hat back patches the kernel they shipped, so their 
software is only compatible with itself.

Other aspects of their setup are specific only to Red Hat.  This make it a 
pain to work through problems, as many of the details are known only to Red 
Hat experts.

I know everyone using Red Hat will scream, but I've gone from SuSE, through 
two versions of  Red Hat, to Debian, and now Gentoo (I hack to fix things the 
way I want, so I choose a distro that's designed for hacking - Gentoo might 
not be best for beginners.)

Try Ubuntu or Kubuntu.  They are specifically aimed at newcomers, and work 
very well out of the box.  You could get the livecd via your Windows 
connection, and try it on your hardware to see how well it does.  As well, 
Knoppix also will let you try your hardware out before installing.

I set up the Red Hat Enterprise Servers at work, and built our software 
installation package for them (not properly - management wasn't interested in 
spending the time unfortunately).  One thing I found was that if I didn't 
install mySQL at first, it couldn't be added later.  Only after several years 
during which the term "rpm hell" was coined did Red Hat get around to coming 
up with a different package management tool -"yum" to make up for failures in 
their initial approach.  If the rpm system worked, there would have been no 
reason to create yum.


> Problem 1 – ADSL Connection
>
> The installation program does not ask me to setup my network connection,
> which I tried under ‘Setup Internet Connection’ as well as ‘Network’.
> My modem is not listed and that’s were the trouble starts.
>
> Somebody advised that I should setup the connection using DHCP instead
> of PPPoA

DHCP is Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol.  It is a message passing standard 
so that two network devices can talk to each other - one requesting and the 
other granting a network IP address.

DHCP will do nothing to negotiate the ADSL connection to your provider.  If 
you have a combination DSL modem AND DHCP server, then your computer would 
connect to that and use DHCP to negotiate it's connection TO THE MODEM/DHCP 
SERVER - but the computer in that case has no knowledge of or involvement in 
the DSL connection.

The connection to your ISP is DSL.  You write that the modem has both USB & 
ethernet connections - does the modem documentation say it can provide a DHCP 
server?  If it only has the one ethernet connector, then it can only provide 
that service for one computer anyway (without you doing some fairly arcane 
work setting up bridging, etc., which is definitely not newbie territory).

To share a single Internet connection among several computers, you have to 
have a router somewhere in the chain to aggregate the connections and 
translate the addresses.  If the device you have has only one ethernet 
connection, it's very unlikely it's a router.

My router itself can use my modem (two distinct devices here) to set up a DSL 
connection.  However, if I connect the modem directly to my computer, either 
by USB or ethernet, my computer must use PPPoE (or variant) to drive the 
connection.

So, does your device have more than one ethernet connector?  Forget the USB 
stuff - that's a single dedicated connection - only if it has more than one 
ethernet connector might it be a router, in which case the DHCP stuff, etc. 
might come into play.


> Problem 2 – Monitor Resolution

> The only resolution that works is the  monitor’s native one, i.e. 1280x1024.

How important is it to you to switch resolutions?

You don't get text the way you like it by switching resolutions - you set up 
the DisplaySize variable and then pick your fonts the way you like them.

You might have other reasons to switch resolutions, but I'll suggest that's 
the wrong approach to take to fix fonts you don't like.  Higher resolution 
means the fonts can be rendered with more pixels, making them smoother.  
Getting the right size is best approached differently.

So, do you know that you have some other reason to switch resolutions, or do 
you simply want to make your fonts the way you want?  We must give different 
advice for the different cases.


> Problem 3 – Audio

Get a live CD for Ubuntu or Knoppix and try booting on it.  That is the best 
indicator of whether your audio can be made to work in GNU/Linux.

I really wouldn't recommend Red Hat for a newbie.  When it works, it works, 
but when it doesn't, too much is customised the "Red Hat way" for a newbie to 
work out.  The knowledge you gain along the way really locks you into Red 
Hat.


> Should I download and install the individual drivers in Windows?  Will
> my Windows OS still work? What chance is there that the Linux RH
> problems I have will be fixed?

Unless Red Hat reaches over and tries to load files from Windows to use, or 
Windows reaches into Red Hat's partitions to do the same (unlikely - Windows 
can't even read ext3 file systems) they have nothing to do with each other.

Nothing.


> Somehow I am a bit weary, Stanton Finleys installation notes in the
> beginning point out that the installation of Linux is easy and can be
> done by everyone; however there are apparently 45 pages of installation
> notes needed to get the job done!
>
> Sorry, I am to say the least a bit frustrated and would appreciate some
> help.

Ditch Red Hat.  Too many things about the distro are specialised to be Red Hat 
only - the knowledge doesn't transfer.  Back patching kernels is especially a 
lock-in to Red Hat.  When you are more of a Linux mechanic, you can try again 
if you like.  But you won't get there without a working Linux install.

And if it worked for you, it would be great.  But it doesn't.  Try Knoppix or 
Ubuntu (I use and recommend Kubuntu - which is Ubuntu with a default KDE 
desktop).

Regards,
Bret

Attachment: pgpnqgJLelzFu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Reply via email to