Hi,

The enemy is proprietary software.

Notice that a lot of people confuse open source software with free software.

Here's another extract from one of the links I've posted.

The official definition of "open source software," as published by the Open
Source Initiative, is very close to our definition of free software;
however, it is a little looser in some respects, and they have accepted a
few licenses that we consider unacceptably restrictive of the users.
However, the obvious meaning for the expression "open source software" is
"You can look at the source code." This is a much weaker criterion than free
software; it includes free software, but also includes
semi-free<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#semi-freeSoftware>programs
such as Xv, and even some
proprietary<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware>programs,
including Qt under its original license (before the QPL).

We shouldn't confuse people with terms like Free Software and Open Source
together.
Freedom of usage is one of the freedom, but there are a few others too. And
some might not fall under certain open source software. A software that
lacks one of the freedom is not called Free Software.

You shouldn't be mixing the ideology of free software along with the promise
of creating better software through open-source. Creating better software
through open-source is a secondary bonus to Free Software Movement, and not
the primary objective unlike Open Source Movement.

If anyone is a bit confused, then noob might be more confused.

Regards
John

On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 "FS vs OSS! Let's battle!"

No... this is wrong. Why are we fighting among ourselves when our enemy is
clearly still controlling the masses? We can argue till the cows come home
and yet won't have any conclusion. So why not we save our energy and work
together? There is so many brains here (yours certainly better than mine)
that can let this group start a campaign.

There must be alternate ways to promote the ideology of free software
along with the promise of creating better software through open-source. If
naming is going to be a problem, maybe we can start by having a mission
statement like "Linux: Committed to developing better software through open
source and providing the freedom of usage" or "Linux - Free & Open".

Just my two-cent worth,
James


 -----Original Message-----
From: Lam YongXian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:15 am
Subject: Re: [Slugnet] Should we start calling this OS GNU/Linux?

 > The average systems admin
> who is running the os because of stability and security will not
> really care about software freedom.

It is really hard to say, I wouldn't generalize. Even if they really
don't, we should teach them. Thats what advocates are for.

> Having non free software in a GNU system kinda defeat the whole
> ideology right?

Yes, it does. But nothing is ever absolute. The main argument is, it
is still a GNU/Linux based system despite not having 100% GNU stuff,
unless otherwise (0% GNU).

> I can safely bet that the naming won't change by the time this thread is
done.

It is about changing individuals vocabulary, not a culture vocabulary.
And to affect the culture, it takes time and effort. We are not asking
the government to proclaim 'Linux' being "Changed" to 'GNU/Linux', in
one =poof=. If everyone thinks like what you said, FSF would have
vanished long ago.

-- Lam YongXian
Adolflam.com

FSF Member #5279

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
 ------------------------------
*Check Out the new free AIM(R) 
Mail*<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100122638x1081283466x1074645346/aol?redir=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaim%2Ecom%2Ffun%2Fmail%2F>--
 2 GB of storage and industry-leading spam and email virus protection.

_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet


_______________________________________________
Slugnet mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet

Reply via email to