Hi, On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Ray Rashif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The client matters, in this case. I prefer to stick to GMail's web interface > because of the conversation grouping and interface, but I have to live > without a reply-to-list function (combination of reply-to-all and reply-to Hmm, a combination of reply-to-all and copy and paste, and perhaps a few deletes work fine. d:
> or so I hear) and top-posting which I myself do not favour. I've been > alright with it because GMail hides those quotes, but I've recently been Actually, I'm using GMail too. Bottom-posting is actually pretty easy with GMail. At least I'm not having any significant problem or nuisance when bottom-posting. Then again, I usually turn off rich formatting unless I really, really need it (I believe, bottom posting is fine with rich formatting too). My problem is with non-standard mailing lists, like those based on Yahoo Groups. Those ads are mighty irritating when rich formatting is on. So I just switch it off. > thinking about those that have clients which do not hide them. From now > onwards, I make the effort to cut out everything. If needed, a few points > can be referenced bottom-posting style. Lol. Thanks for the effort. (: Even with GMail, I find that bottom-posting (to be exact interleaving between points and replies) is easier to follow. Chris _______________________________________________ Slugnet mailing list [email protected] http://wiki.lugs.org.sg/LugsMailingListFaq http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
