Well then give us a broad range of mac addresses so we can see if we may have one of the affected units. Is there a way to interrogate the hardware with a simple program to see if it contains a chip version that points to a possible problem ?
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Nish Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:44:02 +0800 >That is because aP-Indoor were not manufactured during this time. > >This is a limited batch issue - only some quantities of the products >manufactured during a couple of weeks time frame were affected. These >couple of weeks get expanded out into a couple of months due to how the >products move through the distribution channel and warehousing. > >We track manufacturing by MAC #s. But a whole bunch of products flow >through the production line at the same time so it is not possible for >us to know the details of which component was used on which MAC #. > >Nish > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Saathoff >Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:52 PM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > >John, > >Unfortunately, that's not true. I have about 20 bad indoor units and a >friend of my also has RMA'd about the same. The indoor AB uses the same >board as the outdoor and many of the units will fail under heat the same >as >the outdoor one's. Some don't need to be all that hot just sitting in a >window were they get warm. > >I'm assuming you just haven't received any of the bad AirBridge indoors. >Wish I could say the same. :-) > >--Mike > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Hokenson >Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 12:42 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > >What we've done is just switch to the Indoor AP in bridge mode until >this >issue has been dealt with. They are not suffering from any of the known >issues. > >JH >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:37 PM >Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > >> Look into reliawave, proxim, or one of the other certified solutions >as a >> temporary measure. That's what we're doing. It's going to cost us >more >up >> front (trust me, it's more money that we don't really have) but it's >worth >> it to keep clients happy and to keep our installs flowing. We have >the >> attitude that for now we are focusing on revenue. We need to get our >client >> base up and keep them on so we (all WISPs) don't get known as >unreliable. >> >> Ray >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:20 PM >> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >firmware? >> >> >> > Ray, >> > >> > You do have a point but I really dont have any other option >financially >to >> > choose from this was it I could start using some Linksys wet 11's >but in >> other >> > forums when I was doing research these seemed to work but also had a >> lockup >> > problem a while back so I decided to go with a known vendor (Smart >> bridges) and >> > I was happy until now. >> > That's part of my sales pitch I use fully qualified outdoor rated >radios >> not >> > cheap store bought stuff and people like the concept I cant go back >on >my >> word >> > now hehehe I think if SB had a good R & D process we would not see >as >many >> > problems as we do. I think that going forward they or we need to >press >> this >> > issue so we don't keep getting caught with our pants down. I offered >to >> even >> > devote many hours of my not so free time to help develop this >process >and >> even >> > field any tech calls for them once I get more established and not >having >> to do >> > all the work for my WISP with just my partner and I. I think we can >make >> this >> > product really kick some butt, but we have to have the buy in of >smart >> bridges >> > and a few key individuals that will be diligent in testing new >product >> (BETA) >> > and smart bridges will then use this as valuable input before >implementing >> any >> > final changes and we will help with the approval process. I am sure >there >> are >> > many people that are willing to help with this process such as me >and >> those >> > that have some kind of background with working with engineers and >> development >> > people. >> > >> > What are your thoughts?? >> > >> > Martin >> > >> > >> > >> > Quoting Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > >> > > My concern is that with all we've invested in these products (and >I >> really >> > > like them) distributors might start to drop them. Think about it, >if >> you >> > > were Ecomm would you want all this hassle? >> > > >> > > I would rather SB recall or at least put a hold on all shipments >until >> they >> > > get this issue fixed. I would rather use another CPE product that >works >> so >> > > I don't look like a dumb a** to my clients by using beta products >that >> > > simply aren't yet ready. >> > > >> > > I would switch back to SB as soon as the units are again working. >> > > >> > > Ray >> > > >> > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > From: "Martin Moreno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:20 PM >> > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >firmware? >> > > >> > > >> > > > I would agree with that! >> > > > I did not catch what Dist they were getting them from? I get >mine >from >> > > ECOMM >> > > > and they have been pretty good for the most part. I dont like >the >idea >> of >> > > > having a bad unit and they charge your card for the repalcement >ahead >> of >> > > time >> > > > then refund you when they get the non working one back??? Seems >> backwards >> > > to me >> > > > I pitched a fit and got them to send me an APPO in advance >exchange >> liek >> > > their >> > > > warranty clearly states without being charged 1st then charge me >if >I >> > > dont >> > > send >> > > > it back within 10 days. This was after I ordered two new APPO's >and >> one I >> > > > recieved was a used unit sent back for repair! >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Quoting Eje Gustafsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > > > >> > > > > shrug.. Now I am going to shock this entirely list by finally >> agreeing >> > > > > with Chris.. Can't agree more with what you just said. >> > > > > >> > > > > If they all where bad out of the box or a lot of them where >bad >out >> of >> > > > > the box it's the distributor/resellers problem not the >manufacturers >> > > > > if teh distributor or reseller don't want to work with you you >might >> > > > > try to resolve it with the manufacturer if someone gets sued >it >> should >> > > > > be the dist not the manufacturer. The manufacturer will not >give >you >> a >> > > > > refund. They sold the unit for say $10 and you purchased it >for >$20 >> > > > > from the dist so should the manufacturer give you a refund for >$20 >> and >> > > > > lose $10 ??? Come on I think not. If someone should give you a >> refund >> > > > > it's the dist. However if the dist will not work it out then >the >> > > > > manufacturer can give you a working replacement. >> > > > > >> > > > > Best regards, >> > > > > Eje Gustafsson >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > The Family Entertainment Network http://www.fament.com >> > > > > Phone : 620-231-7777 Fax : 620-231-4066 >> > > > > - Your Full Time Professionals - >> > > > > eBay UserID : macahan >> > > > > --- >> > > > > searchable smartBridges mailing list archive. >> > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/smartbridges40part-15.org/ >> > > > > -- >> > > > > p> Ok T n T >> > > > > >> > > > > p> WOW Talk about a drastic calling for attention in my view, >most >> of >> > > the >> > > > > p> people on the board are working on resolving problems and >your >> > > response >> > > > > toa >> > > > > p> firmware issue is that they are advertised as carrier class >and >> that >> > > > > they >> > > > > p> don't offer cash refunds? Umm does cisco or lucent? If so >I'd >> gladly >> > > like >> > > > > to >> > > > > p> get my money back on some AP1000's or CPE Ethernet >Converters >and >> a >> > > few >> > > > > p> cisco 350's. A class action suit? Really I have yet to hear >> anyone >> > > that >> > > > > is >> > > > > p> pissed at the fact that they only exchange units in a >timely >> manner >> > > and >> > > > > wont >> > > > > p> give them there cash back? Personally I don't recall many >groups >> > > that >> > > > > will >> > > > > p> do cash refunds from the primary company isn't this a point >to >> deal >> > > with >> > > > > p> your SUPPLIER if you feel you need to return goods cause >you >> don't >> > > want >> > > > > p> them. >> > > > > >> > > > > p> As far as I can tell in the past SB has stood behind there >> problems >> > > > > p> including phone calls from half way across the world at >10am to >> help >> > > > > solve >> > > > > p> MANY users problems in a one on one basis, they take >suggestions >> and >> > > work >> > > > > to >> > > > > p> help mold there product. Really you have invested 6,000$ >wow I >> have >> > > > > spent >> > > > > p> over 25,000 upgrading my network with SB's powering it and >i >have >> > > yet >> > > to >> > > > > p> find a reason to neglect the funds spent. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > p> AS A NOTE IT SAYS >> > > > > >> > > > > p> DOA Products must be returned in original condition, and >the >> return >> > > box >> > > > > must >> > > > > p> include all components and originally packaged with the >product, >> > > > > including >> > > > > p> cable, software, manual, etc. You must obtain an RMA number >> before >> > > you >> > > > > p> return any defective or DOA products. >> > > > > >> > > > > p> REQUIRES ORIGINAL BOX ON DOA UNITS... DOA MEANS DEAD ON >ARRIVAL >> > > HENCE >> > > > > YOU >> > > > > p> JUST GOT IT SO THEY WANT IT BACK HOW THEY SENT IT SINCE IT >WAS >> DEAD >> > > AS >> > > > > SOON >> > > > > p> AS YOU GOT IT. >> > > > > >> > > > > p> As for the returning on a one to one basis it is not FINE >PRINT >> it >> > > is >> > > > > p> blatantly shown in Standard Sized text under the warranty >> > > conditions. >> > > > > Not >> > > > > p> like they used size 1 font to try to hide it from you. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > p> Sorry if I'm being a di*k but this is just my take on your >> comment. >> > > > > >> > > > > p> Chris >> > > > > p> -----Original Message----- >> > > > > p> From: Tom & Toni Maris >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > p> Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 10:44 PM >> > > > > p> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >> > > > > p> My husband Tom is very pissed. We have invested more than >> $6,000.00 >> > > in >> > > > > this >> > > > > >> > > > > p> gear and we are constantly having prtoblems. >> > > > > p> On their web site thwy claim to be Carrier Class. Now we >read >the >> > > fine >> > > > > print >> > > > > >> > > > > p> on the rmapage and it says they will not give refund just >> > > replacement >> > > > > units >> > > > > p> and that you have to have the original box! >> > > > > p> Original box, replacement unit's, no refunds, Carrier >class. >> > > > > p> This SmartBridges company certainly does not sound like an >honest >> > > > > company. >> > > > > p> First I would like to know where they get off saying >anything >> about >> > > > > Carrier >> > > > > p> class. >> > > > > p> Then if they are so sure about their Carrier class junk, >why do >> you >> > > need >> > > > > an >> > > > > p> original box to sned them back, and why don't they do >refunds? >> > > > > >> > > > > p> Tom, has been talking about a lawsuite to make this >Smartbridge >> > > company >> > > > > p> stand behind their products or give everyone their money >back. >He >> > > thinks >> > > > > >> > > > > p> that their is probably enough people like us who got ripped >off >> to >> > > get a >> > > > > >> > > > > p> class action lawsuite against the company who sold us this >pile >> of >> > > junk >> > > > > >> > > > > p> Very very disapointed >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > p> T n T >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>From: "Blazen Wireless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >new >> > > firmware? >> > > > > >>Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:03:47 -0700 >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Okay so it appears I am not the only one having the problem >here >> We >> > > hav >> > > > > >>users at begining at 3.5 miles and some as far as 7.2 miles >the >> last >> > > > > >>revision 0.01.06 just will not associate to any of my APS I >had >> > > sugested >> > > > > >>there is something going on here and I am finally able to >get on >> this >> > > > > list >> > > > > >>and post only to see what I have been telling support since >last >> week >> > > > > >>before >> > > > > >>the release only to be told its been working well in the >"LAB" >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Here is my post from another forum these things need to be >tested >> in >> > > a >> > > > > >>consistant manor not just really close up. >> > > > > >>1. Measure signal at 1, 2, 3, 4,5 ,6 and 7 miles if possible >> > > > > >>2. At each point do some speed tests to confirm it is >working >and >> how >> > > > > well >> > > > > >>or how bad as you can see at some ares out we get >association >but >> > > speeds >> > > > > >>are >> > > > > >>WAY down. >> > > > > >>These are only 2 that need to be added to the list of >testing >> before >> > > ANY >> > > > > >>final revision is released to save time and nerves of those >of >us >> in >> > > the >> > > > > >>field! >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>I keep asking what is the closest and farthest they have >been >> tested >> > > in >> > > > > the >> > > > > >>"LAB" and I have yet to get an answer? is this something >that is >a >> > > > > secret?? >> > > > > >>I too am not going to change firmware on the APPOS that are >> working >> > > rock >> > > > > >>solid and have ALL my customers down. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> We have tried it (ver 0.01.06 rev 3 final release )and I >have >> seen >> > > > > >>problems >> > > > > >>but to be fair we still need to identify if this firmware is >> > > compatible >> > > > > >>with >> > > > > >>the OLD atmel chip they had. We tried this new firmware on >the >> only >> > > radio >> > > > > >> > > > > >>we >> > > > > >>have left since the other 2 locked up hardcore and are now >> doorstops >> > > > > after >> > > > > >>doing firmware upgrades with rev 2 & rev 3 just before the >final >> > > release. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Here is what we found after 3 hours of testing and we found >the >> same >> > > > > thing >> > > > > >>on rev 2 >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>I don't how you guys feel about it and maybe this firmware >is >not >> > > > > >>compatible >> > > > > >>with the old good atmel chip per say. >> > > > > >>The two test radios that locked up we just bought less then >a >> month >> > > ago so >> > > > > >> > > > > >>I >> > > > > >>can only assume they had the problem. Unless they can come >up >with >> a >> > > way >> > > > > to >> > > > > >>positively identify which units are suspect with the suspect >chip. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>I suggest you do the same tests with a spare radio that you >can >> > > afford >> > > to >> > > > > >>lose if the firmware upgrade goes bad. Basically what >happens is >> the >> > > > > radio >> > > > > >>locks up and it no longer gives an Ethernet connection to >log >into >> > > the >> > > > > >>radio, the power and wireless light stay on solid and you no >> longer >> > > get a >> > > > > >>LAN connection or light many times I was told to reset and >don't >> see >> > > how >> > > > > >>that would work since that just resets passwords and the IP >> address >> > > etc >> > > > > but >> > > > > >>I tried 20 times anyways they even sent me a utility to >unlock >it >> but >> > > > > that >> > > > > >>was useless because you need a network connection to the >radio >> > > hahaha. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Anyways in a nut shell the firmware after testing as you can >see >> in >> > > our >> > > > > >>notes does not work for us yet Smart bridges claims it works >well >> in >> > > the >> > > > > >>lab >> > > > > >>and others have tested as well which I would like to know >how >far >> > > away >> > > > > they >> > > > > >>tested the radio. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>1. ver 0.01.04 loaded originally on this unit and at 3.5 >miles >we >> > > > > associate >> > > > > >>fine and get download speeds in 900kbps to 1.2 megs >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>2. Loaded ver 0.01.06 final rev into radio it loads fine and >at >> same >> > > 3.5 >> > > > > >>mile location we get not even half the speeds we did with >rev >> 0.01.04 >> > > we >> > > > > >>get >> > > > > >>200kbps to 300kbps at most and have lots of packet loss. >> > > > > >>RSSI 85% and signal quality 90-95% with both firmware. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>3. Moved to 5 mile location ran same speed tests with >firmware >> > > 0.01.04 >> > > > > get >> > > > > >>speeds of 800kbps consistently loaded ver 0.01.06 final >revision >> and >> > > we >> > > > > >>associate but thats it radio will not ping APPO on tower but >we >> can >> > > ping >> > > > > >>ABO >> > > > > >>radio with new firmware. RSSI 80% signal quality 80% with >both >> > > firmware. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>So as you can see this firmware will not work for us. I >don't >> > > understand >> > > > > >>what happened it seems that this is now possibly a timing >issue? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>The only question I have is will version 0.01.06 work on old >> radios >> > > with >> > > > > >>old >> > > > > >>atmel chip? and if not then we will proceed further to load >the >> > > 0.01.06 >> > > > > on >> > > > > >>clients radios but once again we have no way of telling >which >> radios >> > > have >> > > > > >>new or old atmel chip? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Our coverage area begins at 3.5 miles and runs >> > > > > >>out to 7.2 miles. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>----- Original Message ----- >> > > > > >>From: "Colorado Wisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:18 PM >> > > > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >new >> > > firmware? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Nish, >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>We updated several of one of our "overheating" units this >morning >> and >> > > it >> > > > > >>will not associate with our APs running 1.4j.5. We have no >plans >> to >> > > > > update >> > > > > >>the firmware on the APs, they have been rock solid. Is >there >> going >> > > to >> > > be >> > > > > >>firmware that will interact this firmware version? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Chris >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>--- >> > > > > >>Colorado WISP llc. http://www.cowisp.net >> > > > > >>Bringing high speed internet to rural communities. >> > > > > >>P.O. Box 55 >> > > > > >>Wellington, Colorado 80549 >> > > > > >>970-218-5295 >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >> > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >>On Behalf Of Nish Park >> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 2:49 AM >> > > > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >new >> > > firmware? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Tim, >> > > > > >>Can you please elaborate a little more on this "still doing >the >> same >> > > > > >>thing!". What was the problem, new unit (June or July >purchase?), >> > > RSSI >> > > > > and >> > > > > >>LQ values, Brand of AP? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>We have confirmed that the problem of loosing association at >> elevated >> > > > > >>temperature has been solved. This has been the focus of all >our >> > > efforts >> > > > > and >> > > > > >>we are quire confident that issue no longer exist. Now we >will >be >> > > > > focusing >> > > > > >>on testing if there has been any other side effects. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >From some of the emails it appears that some of you are >trying >> to >> > > see >> > > > > >> >if >> > > > > >>the new F/W also fixes the old/lingering problem of >"periodic >> > > lockup". >> > > I >> > > > > >>will be pleasantly surprised to hear that it does, but that >has >> not >> > > been >> > > > > >>the >> > > > > >>focus of the current activity on hand. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Thanks for your support. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Nish >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >> > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >>On Behalf Of Tim Harris >> > > > > >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:32 PM >> > > > > >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> > > > > >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the >new >> > > firmware? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Yep, I installed it this afternoon on a client's unit. Had >to >> unplug >> > > it >> > > > > to >> > > > > >>get it to start working after uploading the new firmware. >Started >> > > > > working >> > > > > >>fine. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Customer called back an hour later and left two messages, >still >> doing >> > > the >> > > > > >>same thing! >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>If it smells like it, if it looks like it........ >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Hmm, maybe the guy with the Hotmail address might have a >point. >> This >> > > > > seems >> > > > > >>to be getting ridiculous. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>I'm doing two more tomorrow morning, I'll post a response >then.. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>Tim Harris, Operations >> > > > > >>www.dwisp.net >> > > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>----- Original Message ----- >> > > > > >>From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > > >>Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:09 AM >> > > > > >>Subject: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new >> firmware? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > Has anyone installed the new firmware? I'm getting ready >to >> try, >> > > but >> > > > > >> > wanted to check first to see what sort of luck others >have >had. >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > Thanks >> > > > > >> > Sam >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > > > >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >> subscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >> > > > > >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >> > > unsubscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges) >> > > > > >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >subscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > (in >> > > > > the >> > > > > >>body type unsubscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges) >> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >subscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > (in >> > > > > the >> > > > > >>body type unsubscribe smartBridges) >> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >subscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >> > > > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >> unsubscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges) >> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > > > >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >subscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges <yournickname> >> > > > > >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >> unsubscribe >> > > > > >>smartBridges) >> > > > > >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > > > >> > > > > p> >_________________________________________________________________ >> > > > > p> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* >> > > > > p> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail >> > > > > >> > > > > p> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > > > p> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >subscribe >> > > > > p> smartBridges <yournickname> >> > > > > p> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >> unsubscribe >> > > > > p> smartBridges) >> > > > > p> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] >> > > > > >> > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >subscribe >> > > smartBridges >> > > > > <yournickname> >> > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >unsubscribe >> > > > > smartBridges) >> > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Martin Moreno >> > > > Blazen Wireless >> > > > 909-907-4106 >> > > > www.blazenwireless.com >> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >> > > smartBridges <yournickname> >> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >unsubscribe >> > > smartBridges) >> > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > --- >> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >> > > Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 >> > > >> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >> smartBridges >> > > <yournickname> >> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type >unsubscribe >> > > smartBridges) >> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > > >> > >> > >> > Martin Moreno >> > Blazen Wireless >> > 909-907-4106 >> > www.blazenwireless.com >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >> smartBridges <yournickname> >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >> smartBridges) >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >> > >> >> >> --- >> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >> Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/11/2003 >> >> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >smartBridges <yournickname> >> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >smartBridges) >> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >smartBridges <yournickname> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe >smartBridges <yournickname> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe >smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges ><yournickname> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
