Never did get our AS53192 to pass V.92 traffic. Finally gave up and shipped it back.
JH ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lewis Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 7:09 PM Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > Can I throw in it took 9 MONTHS for Cisco to resolve an issue with their > AS5350 access server. (actually it took 3 days; the other 267 days they > screwed off and didn't get serious until they were paying for the circuit > it was plugged into.) > > SmartBridges has done an excellent job getting this bug fixed ( I hope :-) > Lewis > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan @ Wyoming.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 9:03 PM > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new firmware? > > > > I will give you 51 cents on the dollar and give you all of my MaxTech > > and Cisco Gear. Lets see you get support from Cisco like we are > > getting from SB. At least SB is trying. Our Cisco stuff has never > > been stable in the 5 years we have used it plus it was twice the cost > > of SB gear. > > > > Thanks.......Dan > > > > On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 17:25:42 -0500 > > Bill Flood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ray, shame on you! I'll give them 50 cents. When can they ship! > > > Must be in the original box though.... :-P > > > > > > > > > > > > At 02:59 PM 7/20/2003 -0700, you wrote: > > > >I'll pay you 25 cents on the dollar for your Smartbridges equipment > > > >since > > > >they don't work. > > > > > > > >Ray > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Stuart Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 12:48 PM > > > >Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > >firmware? > > > > > > > > > > > >> Sell the stuff then and rip off the rear view mirror. We use more > > > >manufacturers than Smartbridges and we have had very little problems > > > >with > > > >Smartbridges. Sounds like all of your equipment is just not working > > > >at all, > > > >so it would be best to just sell it and move on. > > > >> > > > >> ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > > > >> From: "Tom & Toni Maris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 21:43:58 -0500 > > > >> > > > >> >My husband Tom is very pissed. We have invested more than > > > >>$6,000.00 in > > > >this > > > >> >gear and we are constantly having prtoblems. > > > >> >On their web site thwy claim to be Carrier Class. Now we read the > > > >>fine > > > >print > > > >> >on the rmapage and it says they will not give refund just > > > >>replacement > > > >units > > > >> >and that you have to have the original box! > > > >> >Original box, replacement unit's, no refunds, Carrier class. > > > >> >This SmartBridges company certainly does not sound like an honest > > > >company. > > > >> >First I would like to know where they get off saying anything > > > >>about > > > >Carrier > > > >> >class. > > > >> >Then if they are so sure about their Carrier class junk, why do > > > >>you need > > > >an > > > >> >original box to sned them back, and why don't they do refunds? > > > >> > > > > >> >Tom, has been talking about a lawsuite to make this Smartbridge > > > >>company > > > >> >stand behind their products or give everyone their money back. He > > > >>thinks > > > >> >that their is probably enough people like us who got ripped off to > > > >>get a > > > >> >class action lawsuite against the company who sold us this pile of > > > >>junk > > > >> > > > > >> >Very very disapointed > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >T n T > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>From: "Blazen Wireless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> >>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > >>firmware? > > > >> >>Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:03:47 -0700 > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Okay so it appears I am not the only one having the problem here > > > >>We hav > > > >> >>users at begining at 3.5 miles and some as far as 7.2 miles the > > > >>last > > > >> >>revision 0.01.06 just will not associate to any of my APS I had > > > >>sugested > > > >> >>there is something going on here and I am finally able to get on > > > >>this > > > >list > > > >> >>and post only to see what I have been telling support since last > > > >>week > > > >> >>before > > > >> >>the release only to be told its been working well in the "LAB" > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Here is my post from another forum these things need to be tested > > > >>in a > > > >> >>consistant manor not just really close up. > > > >> >>1. Measure signal at 1, 2, 3, 4,5 ,6 and 7 miles if possible > > > >> >>2. At each point do some speed tests to confirm it is working and > > > >>how > > > >well > > > >> >>or how bad as you can see at some ares out we get association but > > > >>speeds > > > >> >>are > > > >> >>WAY down. > > > >> >>These are only 2 that need to be added to the list of testing > > > >>before ANY > > > >> >>final revision is released to save time and nerves of those of us > > > >>in the > > > >> >>field! > > > >> >> > > > >> >>I keep asking what is the closest and farthest they have been > > > >>tested in > > > >the > > > >> >>"LAB" and I have yet to get an answer? is this something that is > > > >>a > > > >secret?? > > > >> >>I too am not going to change firmware on the APPOS that are > > > >>working rock > > > >> >>solid and have ALL my customers down. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> We have tried it (ver 0.01.06 rev 3 final release )and I have > > > >>seen > > > >> >>problems > > > >> >>but to be fair we still need to identify if this firmware is > > > >>compatible > > > >> >>with > > > >> >>the OLD atmel chip they had. We tried this new firmware on the > > > >>only > > > >radio > > > >> >>we > > > >> >>have left since the other 2 locked up hardcore and are now > > > >>doorstops > > > >after > > > >> >>doing firmware upgrades with rev 2 & rev 3 just before the final > > > >release. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Here is what we found after 3 hours of testing and we found the > > > >>same > > > >thing > > > >> >>on rev 2 > > > >> >> > > > >> >>I don't how you guys feel about it and maybe this firmware is not > > > >> >>compatible > > > >> >>with the old good atmel chip per say. > > > >> >>The two test radios that locked up we just bought less then a > > > >>month ago > > > >so > > > >> >>I > > > >> >>can only assume they had the problem. Unless they can come up > > > >>with a way > > > >to > > > >> >>positively identify which units are suspect with the suspect > > > >>chip. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>I suggest you do the same tests with a spare radio that you can > > > >>afford > > > >to > > > >> >>lose if the firmware upgrade goes bad. Basically what happens is > > > >>the > > > >radio > > > >> >>locks up and it no longer gives an Ethernet connection to log > > > >>into the > > > >> >>radio, the power and wireless light stay on solid and you no > > > >>longer get > > > >a > > > >> >>LAN connection or light many times I was told to reset and don't > > > >>see how > > > >> >>that would work since that just resets passwords and the IP > > > >>address etc > > > >but > > > >> >>I tried 20 times anyways they even sent me a utility to unlock it > > > >>but > > > >that > > > >> >>was useless because you need a network connection to the radio > > > >>hahaha. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Anyways in a nut shell the firmware after testing as you can see > > > >>in our > > > >> >>notes does not work for us yet Smart bridges claims it works well > > > >>in the > > > >> >>lab > > > >> >>and others have tested as well which I would like to know how far > > > >>away > > > >they > > > >> >>tested the radio. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>1. ver 0.01.04 loaded originally on this unit and at 3.5 miles we > > > >associate > > > >> >>fine and get download speeds in 900kbps to 1.2 megs > > > >> >> > > > >> >>2. Loaded ver 0.01.06 final rev into radio it loads fine and at > > > >>same 3.5 > > > >> >>mile location we get not even half the speeds we did with rev > > > >>0.01.04 we > > > >> >>get > > > >> >>200kbps to 300kbps at most and have lots of packet loss. > > > >> >>RSSI 85% and signal quality 90-95% with both firmware. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>3. Moved to 5 mile location ran same speed tests with firmware > > > >>0.01.04 > > > >get > > > >> >>speeds of 800kbps consistently loaded ver 0.01.06 final revision > > > >>and we > > > >> >>associate but thats it radio will not ping APPO on tower but we > > > >>can ping > > > >> >>ABO > > > >> >>radio with new firmware. RSSI 80% signal quality 80% with both > > > >>firmware. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>So as you can see this firmware will not work for us. I don't > > > >>understand > > > >> >>what happened it seems that this is now possibly a timing issue? > > > >> >> > > > >> >>The only question I have is will version 0.01.06 work on old > > > >>radios with > > > >> >>old > > > >> >>atmel chip? and if not then we will proceed further to load the > > > >>0.01.06 > > > >on > > > >> >>clients radios but once again we have no way of telling which > > > >>radios > > > >have > > > >> >>new or old atmel chip? > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Our coverage area begins at 3.5 miles and runs > > > >> >>out to 7.2 miles. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>----- Original Message ----- > > > >> >>From: "Colorado Wisp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 1:18 PM > > > >> >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > >>firmware? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Nish, > > > >> >> > > > >> >>We updated several of one of our "overheating" units this morning > > > >>and it > > > >> >>will not associate with our APs running 1.4j.5. We have no plans > > > >>to > > > >update > > > >> >>the firmware on the APs, they have been rock solid. Is there > > > >>going to > > > >be > > > >> >>firmware that will interact this firmware version? > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Chris > > > >> >> > > > >> >>--- > > > >> >>Colorado WISP llc. http://www.cowisp.net > > > >> >>Bringing high speed internet to rural communities. > > > >> >>P.O. Box 55 > > > >> >>Wellington, Colorado 80549 > > > >> >>970-218-5295 > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >>-----Original Message----- > > > >> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >>On Behalf Of Nish Park > > > >> >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 2:49 AM > > > >> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >>Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > >>firmware? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Tim, > > > >> >>Can you please elaborate a little more on this "still doing the > > > >>same > > > >> >>thing!". What was the problem, new unit (June or July purchase?), > > > >>RSSI > > > >and > > > >> >>LQ values, Brand of AP? > > > >> >> > > > >> >>We have confirmed that the problem of loosing association at > > > >>elevated > > > >> >>temperature has been solved. This has been the focus of all our > > > >>efforts > > > >and > > > >> >>we are quire confident that issue no longer exist. Now we will be > > > >focusing > > > >> >>on testing if there has been any other side effects. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> >From some of the emails it appears that some of you are trying > > > >>to see > > > >> >> >if > > > >> >>the new F/W also fixes the old/lingering problem of "periodic > > > >>lockup". I > > > >> >>will be pleasantly surprised to hear that it does, but that has > > > >>not been > > > >> >>the > > > >> >>focus of the current activity on hand. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Thanks for your support. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Nish > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >>-----Original Message----- > > > >> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >>On Behalf Of Tim Harris > > > >> >>Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 12:32 PM > > > >> >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > > > >> >>Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > >>firmware? > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Yep, I installed it this afternoon on a client's unit. Had to > > > >>unplug it > > > >to > > > >> >>get it to start working after uploading the new firmware. > > > >> Started > > > >working > > > >> >>fine. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Customer called back an hour later and left two messages, still > > > >>doing > > > >the > > > >> >>same thing! > > > >> >> > > > >> >>If it smells like it, if it looks like it........ > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Hmm, maybe the guy with the Hotmail address might have a point. > > > >> This > > > >seems > > > >> >>to be getting ridiculous. > > > >> >> > > > >> >>I'm doing two more tomorrow morning, I'll post a response then.. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >>Tim Harris, Operations > > > >> >>www.dwisp.net > > > >> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >>----- Original Message ----- > > > >> >>From: "Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> >>Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:09 AM > > > >> >>Subject: [smartBridges] Anyone having issues with the new > > > >>firmware? > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Has anyone installed the new firmware? I'm getting ready to > > > >>try, but > > > >> >> > wanted to check first to see what sort of luck others have > > > >>had. > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > Thanks > > > >> >> > Sam > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > >> >> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > >>subscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > > >> >> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > >>unsubscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges) > > > >> >> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > >> >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: > > > >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in > > > >the > > > >> >>body type unsubscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges) > > > >> >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > >> >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: > > > >>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in > > > >the > > > >> >>body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > > > >> >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > >> >> > > > >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > >> >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > > >> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > >>unsubscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges) > > > >> >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > >> >> > > > >> >>The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > >> >>To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges <yournickname> > > > >> >>To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > >>unsubscribe > > > >> >>smartBridges) > > > >> >>Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > >> > > > > >> >_________________________________________________________________ > > > >> >The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* > > > >> >http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > > >> > > > > >> >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > >> >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > >smartBridges <yournickname> > > > >> >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > >>unsubscribe > > > >smartBridges) > > > >> >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > >> >--- > > > >> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> --- > > > >> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net] > > > >> > > > >> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > >> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > >smartBridges <yournickname> > > > >> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > >>unsubscribe > > > >smartBridges) > > > >> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >--- > > > >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > >Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 7/18/2003 > > > > > > > >The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > >To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > >smartBridges <yournickname> > > > >To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > > >smartBridges) > > > >Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > Bill Flood > > > AirRunner Networks LLC --- We make the web fast! > > > If you get tired of the wait call 715-443-3700! > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > > smartBridges) > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
