Put
the first layer on with the sticky side out. That way you won't get any adhesive
left on the connector.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Proctor
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Are Ethernet connections sensitive to rust & oxide????
Guys,From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Proctor
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Are Ethernet connections sensitive to rust & oxide????
The correct way to waterproof these connectors and the RF connectors on your installations is to put a layer of electrical tape down first, then the elephant snot, then another layer of tape over that. The first layer of tape allows you to simply take a utility knife and slit the waterproofing lengthwise and take the whole works off very cleanly. Any of you that have tried to take a connector apart that does not have that first layer of tape will understand what I mean.
Cheers!
Kevin
Kevin B. Proctor Customer Service Electro-Comm Distributing Inc. 5015 Paris St. Denver, CO 80239 +1-800-525-0173 +1-303-371-8182 +1-303-371-8158 FAX +1-800-423-8018 FAX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shawn Mitchell wrote:
I don't trust using black tape, it's not waterproof. You can think it us, but it's not. If your going to have a RJ-45 connection outside, use a weather proofing kit. It's basically a highly malleable tar like substance that you mold around the entire connector. Makes it totally waterproof in all kinds of weather. It either that, or for the couplers I use silicone around the entire thing. Not a light coating of it, but a nice large amount. I've cut off the silicone after a nice hard rain, and they've always been dry as a bone. When I first started doing I wrapped them a large amount of black tape, and I always had a problem with corrosion after a few months. Now I don't have any problems. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Hartley Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 22:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Are ethernet connection sensible to rust & oxide???? I'm not an expert and can't quote scientific studies, but I can say YES, cat5 connections are totally screwed up by oxidation and corrosion. You'll get weird behavior that is very hard to figure out logically. Remove the corroded parts and everything starts to work as planned. The main thing to avoid is the moisture that causes the rust and corrosion. Pascal Losier wrote:I used waterproofing mastic and tape on the regular sheilded RJ-45C connector. Once you waterproof your installs with black mastic & Tape, No water will ever get in. I dont trust those little fitting on APP.... So I remove it. But How about rust,... Are ethernet connection sensible to rust & oxide ???? Im in satellite buisness since last 10 years so my connector use to be coaxials. They are a lot bigger. So rust & cold connection were not an issue. Are ethernet connection sensible to rust & oxide ???? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Hartley Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Cat5 for outdoor installs A few days ago, I had one of my most important customers go completely off the air. I did a lot of trouble shooting and found out it was the airBridge Total "waterproof" connector had allowed water in. Maybe I don't know the correct way to install it, I thought I did. But after drying out the connectors, recrimping the end towards the house, it still wouldn't work. I cut off about a foot of the cable going into the house and pulled out some of the individual wires, they were wet inside the jacket. This customer now has gel-filled cable going from the connector to the router ... *and* I used waterproofing mastic and tape on the waterproof connector. Laurence Laforga wrote:Is that one gel-filled? I recall someone saying that the gel-filled is ideal for underground type of install and that just the UV rated ones are required and cheaper for outdoor installs on roofs and such.I use the Tyco brand for CSC and don't have a problem with crimping.-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Cat5 for outdoor installs I concur that it is a PITA to crimp! Anyone know if there areconnectorsthat fit it better to make crimping easier? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Hartley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Cat5 for outdoor installsprefix: cwc part # 5exho4p24bkrmohpv This is the gel-filled type. Seems to be very good quality, buta PITAto crimp. David Ross Buckley wrote:I recall some posts awhile back about recommended cat5 cablefor outdoorinstalls. I believe someone even gave a part number fromGraybar. Ifpossible can we get that number again, it would be greatlyappreciated.Thanks in advance.The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
--
The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges
