..or at least one more step to being able to make a change now to all (or some) of my client's radios without having to roll the truck to each and every one of them. Which is of course what I get to do now since they are still all running the 0.09.10 firmware. :-) Oh well, one more time around to visit them, and then it can all be run from the office. That's going to save me a HUGE amount of time.
SB Team! Thanks for the hard work, and excellent effort. It seems to have paid off. Kevin Summers KISTech Internet Services Inc. www.kistech.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07 > > > Sweet! One more step to better security! > > Ray > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kevin Summers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:44 PM > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07 > > > > > > Tested PPPoE with MikroTik RouterOS version 2.7.0 > > > > Test # 1 - Linksys Cable/DSL Router > > > > - unsuccessful. I plugged the wrong wall wart into it > > and I think I fried it. > > > > Test # 2 - Efficient Networks Speedstream Cable/DSL Router > > > > - PPPoE Login worked fine > > - Internet access didn't work that great because the router > > wouldn't accept the subnet mask I gave it for it's WAN > > interface of 255.255.255.255. It automatically assumed > > 255.0.0.0 because it was a 65.x.x.x address. > > (now I know why these were only $12 at Fry's...) > > > > Test # 3 - SMC Barricade Cable/DSL Router > > > > - unsuccessful. This unit I think is also fried, but when > > a manufacturer wants you to use a paperclip and hold it > > on pins 4 and 9 for up to 30 seconds to reset the device, > > you are probably better off without it. > > > > Test # 4 - NEW Linksys Cable/DSL Router > > > > - PPPoE login was successful and I was able to get about 768K > > throughput on it. I'm checking into why it's so slow. > > > > Looks like the problem has been fixed, and PPPoE does indeed > > work fine on the new firmware with MikroTik... > > > > Kevin Summers > > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > > www.kistech.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:02 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07 > > > > > > > > > I'm sitting at my computer repeatedly hitting "Send/Receive"... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Kevin Summers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:47 PM > > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm just about to test it with MikroTik. > > > > > > > > Kevin Summers > > > > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > > > > www.kistech.com > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:31 PM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone tested this with Mikrotik? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Lars Gaarden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:18 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Eric Helm wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > We unsuccessfully tested a NetScreen firewall PPPoE > client. This > > > > > particular > > > > > > > client has the same problem most other PPPoE clients had with > the > > > old > > > > > > > firmware. > > > > > > > > > > > > Odd. I tested 0.01.07 today, and from what I can tell from > > > the packet > > > > > > dumps it should work perfectly for any RFC compliant PPPoE > > > client and > > > > > > server. (good work, sB!) > > > > > > > > > > > > Any chance you could provide a packet dump of the > > > connection attempt? > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you by any chance using PPPoE relay? Some clients - > especially > > > > > > el-cheapo broadband routers - won't work correctly with PPPoE > relay. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't work for sB but I have a vested interest in making sure > that > > > > > > the PPPoE pass-through on the airBridge works perfectly. > > > We're running > > > > > > a pure PPPoE network too, and are planning to switch > from airPoint > > > > > > indoors in clientbirdge mode to airBridge Outdoor for the CPEs. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > LarsG > > > > > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > unsubscribe > > > > > smartBridges) > > > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > > > unsubscribe smartBridges) > > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > > > smartBridges) > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > > unsubscribe smartBridges) > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 7/18/2003 > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > unsubscribe smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
