On a WET11 PPPoE works OK, But the DHCP-pool method does NOT work. None of
our Mikrotiks are set up for enabled-address so we can't test that method.

We only have a couple of WET11's to try them out and only one is in service.
They work so poorly we didn't want any more.

John
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "sB Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 5:47 AM
Subject: RE: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07


> DHCP Pool method will not work with airBridge in firmware 0.01.07 due to
> Mac translation. Enabled Address method is working fine. Has anyone
> tested DHCP pool method on the same with WET11?
>
> sB Tech Support
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Banes
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:11 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07
>
> Did you indicate a while back that you were using Mikrotik hotspots? If
> so
> does the new 0.01.07 firmware work with the dhcp-pool login method?
>
> John
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Kevin Summers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 10:31 PM
> Subject: RE: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07
>
>
> >
> > ..or at least one more step to being able to make a change
> > now to all (or some) of my client's radios without having
> > to roll the truck to each and every one of them. Which is
> > of course what I get to do now since they are still all
> > running the 0.09.10 firmware. :-) Oh well, one more time
> > around to visit them, and then it can all be run from the
> > office. That's going to save me a HUGE amount of time.
> >
> > SB Team! Thanks for the hard work, and excellent effort.
> > It seems to have paid off.
> >
> > Kevin Summers
> > KISTech Internet Services Inc.
> > www.kistech.com
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:52 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07
> > >
> > >
> > > Sweet!  One more step to better security!
> > >
> > > Ray
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Kevin Summers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:44 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Tested PPPoE with MikroTik RouterOS version 2.7.0
> > > >
> > > > Test # 1 - Linksys Cable/DSL Router
> > > >
> > > > - unsuccessful. I plugged the wrong wall wart into it
> > > >   and I think I fried it.
> > > >
> > > > Test # 2 - Efficient Networks Speedstream Cable/DSL Router
> > > >
> > > > - PPPoE Login worked fine
> > > > - Internet access didn't work that great because the router
> > > >   wouldn't accept the subnet mask I gave it for it's WAN
> > > >   interface of 255.255.255.255. It automatically assumed
> > > >   255.0.0.0 because it was a 65.x.x.x address.
> > > >   (now I know why these were only $12 at Fry's...)
> > > >
> > > > Test # 3 - SMC Barricade Cable/DSL Router
> > > >
> > > > - unsuccessful. This unit I think is also fried, but when
> > > >   a manufacturer wants you to use a paperclip and hold it
> > > >   on pins 4 and 9 for up to 30 seconds to reset the device,
> > > >   you are probably better off without it.
> > > >
> > > > Test # 4 - NEW Linksys Cable/DSL Router
> > > >
> > > > - PPPoE login was successful and I was able to get about 768K
> > > >   throughput on it. I'm checking into why it's so slow.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like the problem has been fixed, and PPPoE does indeed
> > > > work fine on the new firmware with MikroTik...
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Summers
> > > > KISTech Internet Services Inc.
> > > > www.kistech.com
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 4:02 PM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sitting at my computer repeatedly hitting "Send/Receive"...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Kevin Summers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:47 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version 0.01.07
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm just about to test it with MikroTik.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kevin Summers
> > > > > > KISTech Internet Services Inc.
> > > > > > www.kistech.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ray
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:31 PM
> > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version
> 0.01.07
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Has anyone tested this with Mikrotik?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > > From: "Lars Gaarden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 3:18 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] PPPoE on Firmware version
> 0.01.07
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Eric Helm wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We unsuccessfully tested a NetScreen firewall PPPoE
> > > client. This
> > > > > > > particular
> > > > > > > > > client has the same problem most other PPPoE clients had
> with
> > > the
> > > > > old
> > > > > > > > > firmware.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Odd. I tested 0.01.07 today, and from what I can tell from
> > > > > the packet
> > > > > > > > dumps it should work perfectly for any RFC compliant PPPoE
> > > > > client and
> > > > > > > > server. (good work, sB!)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Any chance you could provide a packet dump of the
> > > > > connection attempt?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Are you by any chance using PPPoE relay? Some clients -
> > > especially
> > > > > > > > el-cheapo broadband routers - won't work correctly with
> PPPoE
> > > relay.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I don't work for sB but I have a vested interest in making
> sure
> > > that
> > > > > > > > the PPPoE pass-through on the airBridge works perfectly.
> > > > > We're running
> > > > > > > > a pure PPPoE network too, and are planning to switch
> > > from airPoint
> > > > > > > > indoors in clientbirdge mode to airBridge Outdoor for the
> CPEs.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > LarsG
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> subscribe
> > > > > > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> > > unsubscribe
> > > > > > > smartBridges)
> > > > > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> subscribe
> > > > > > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> > > > > > > unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > > > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> subscribe
> > > > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> unsubscribe
> > > > > smartBridges)
> > > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> > > > > unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > > >
> > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> unsubscribe
> > > smartBridges)
> > > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > > Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 7/18/2003
> > >
> > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> > > smartBridges <yournickname>
> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type
> > > unsubscribe smartBridges)
> > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
> > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
> >
>
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
> smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
> smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>
> The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
> To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe
smartBridges <yournickname>
> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe
smartBridges)
> Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
>


The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to