RE: [smartBridges] Airpoint PRO special european(?) version/certification?

[phantam]

Title: RE: [smartBridges] Airpoint PRO special european(?) version/certification?

Nish I hate to sound frank but the "in our next radios" is driving me mad lol I just cant take the pressure it sounds so tempting but having only "guestimates" at whats being done by the other wisps and a few hints from sb is driving us hardcore sb users nuts I would think or atleast me I mean so far the release date has been changed (could be 2010 for all I know) no even hint at a list of features, I really cant pass of the reason to wait if I don't know what im waiting on and my idiot network admin wants to start using cisco ap's and I don't want to I want to standardize on the sb's (or shall I say continue to standardize on them)   Chris   From: Nish Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Radio's ability to reject outside the band frequency signals (adjacent band). Helps with the interference issues.   We tune each radio in the factory to maximize these characteristics.   Nish     -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of phantam Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:08 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Airpoint PRO special european(?) version/certi fication?   Pardon the ignorance, my vocab sucks today whats' sideband suppression again? -----Original Message----- From: Nish Park [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lars, You are correct about sideband suppression. We will take care of this issue on our next generation radio design. Nish   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lars Gaarden Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:08 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Airpoint PRO special european(?) version/certification? Gino A. Villarini wrote: > I assume the offer the regular airbridge and adjust the power though simple > monitor simpleMonitor won't let you go lower than 11.5dBm or higher than 17.5dBm. If it is possible to run them at 7dBm without any adverse effect on signal quality or stability, I'd do so in a heartbeat because it would allow us in ETSI land to use more powerful CPE antennas. I think someone mentioned problems with sideband suppression with regards to output below 11.5, but I might be mistaken. -- LarsG The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org