Rob, Is there a way to make it work on Win2K system that is already running MRTG?
Thanks, -C�sar Artiga http://www.calcom.us (408) 499-8389 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Martinson Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Paging / Latency / Pinging WAS RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate It's not all that difficult actually. If you're interested and need a hand, let me know. Rob Martinson http://www.limelyte.com 509-241-0138 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Summers > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Paging / Latency / Pinging WAS RE: > [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > > > That's pretty sweet. Wish I had that kind of detail > going on my monitoring. Then again if I would just hire > someone so I would have time to learn Perl I could have > some monitoring going on like that... :-) > > Kevin Summers > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > www.kistech.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Martinson > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:13 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Paging / Latency / Pinging WAS RE: [smartBridges] 100% > > Failure Rate > > > > > > > > You guys and girls looking for something to monitor latency > and send > > you a page when the link is out of a specific range might > also want to > > take a look at SmokePing from Tobias Oetiker (MRTG, RRDTool). > > > > We use it to graph latency on internal as well as to remote > networks > > (to keep an eye on our provider and our routing). Additionally we > > monitor a couple of our smartBridges devices and some other > internal > > devices with alarms. > > > > I just set up a new Mikrotik last week and rebuilt the graphing > > machine. Haven't yet restored our past history so graphs > are new, but > > you can take a peek at: http://www.limelyte.com/network.php?id=13 > > (more on the left nav). > > > > URL for smokeping is here: > > http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/smokeping/ > > > > This may also help some of you who mentioned that constant pings to > > your failing smartBridges equipment is preventing disassociation. > > > > Rob Martinson > > http://www.limelyte.com > > 509-241-0138 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blazen Wireless > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:23 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > > > > > I have been using this software called SERVERS ALIVE its > free and lets > > you ping up to 10 servers and if you want to ping more up > to 1000 IP's > > then you buy the license key for $100 it has tons of cool > things you > > can set up with it, remote reboots of servers etc etc.. > > > > http://www.woodstone.nu/salive/ > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Kevin Summers > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 3:20 PM > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > > > > > What are you using for paging? I've been looking for a good > solution > > for that... Kevin Summers > > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > > www.kistech.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Blazen Wireless > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:54 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > > > > > Mine pages me too I got tired of all the pages so I shut that off! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: The Wirefree Network > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 2:06 PM > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > > > > > Now isn't this a bit TOOOOOO coincidental?!?!? I mentioned > 10:20 am on > > mine. However, that is when IPCheck paged me to tell me. When I > > checked my log, it actually went down at 10:15.30 Pacific Standard > > Time. > > > > Anyone else go down at the same time??? > > > > Sully > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Blazen Wireless > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:41 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > > > I mentioned at around 9-10:30am that a few went offline I > can check my > > logs from today I think they both crapped out at about > 10:15 today.. > > Here ar my logs sorry it was soo long but you can see the > times quite > > clearly when the 10.0.0.98 unit went down and it is still down no > > moatter how many times I try to ping it or reboot the APPO it is > > supposed to associate to.. it was good all night then at around > > 10:14PT 10.0.0.98 it went down > > > > > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms Monday, > > August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 Monday, August 25, 2003 > > 10:09:08 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with a successrate of 100% and an > > average roundtriptime of 52.2ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM > > Ping 66.80.227.107 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping > > 66.80.227.107 OK with a successrate of 100% and an average > > roundtriptime of 44ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping > > 66.80.227.98 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping > 66.80.227.98 OK > > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 34ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 64.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with a > successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 32ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with > a successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:11 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:12 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with > a successrate > > of 80% and an average roundtriptime of 27.5ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:12 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 OK with > a successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 34ms > > > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:04 AM Check cycle starts ( 0- > 1) Monday, > > August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 Monday, August 25, 2003 > > 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with a successrate of 100% and an > > average roundtriptime of 46ms Monday, August 25, 2003 > 10:14:05 AM Ping > > 10.0.0.14 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping > 10.0.0.14 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 40ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 44.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > failed due to a > > successrate of only 0% > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with a > successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with > a successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 48ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with > a successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed due to a > > successrate of only 0% > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:20 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:25 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > failed due to a > > successrate of only 0% > > > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Check cycle starts ( 1- > 2) Monday, > > August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 Monday, August 25, 2003 > > 10:15:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with a successrate of 100% and an > > average roundtriptime of 26ms Monday, August 25, 2003 > 10:15:20 AM Ping > > 10.0.0.14 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping > 10.0.0.14 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 46.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:27 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > failed due to a > > successrate of only 0% > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with a > successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 28ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with > a successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:32 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:33 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with > a successrate > > of 80% and an average roundtriptime of 30ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:33 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed due to a > > successrate of only 0% > > > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Check cycle starts ( 2- > 3) Monday, > > August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 Monday, August 25, 2003 > > 10:17:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with a success of 100% and an average > > roundtriptime of 42ms Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Ping > > 10.0.0.14 Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping > 10.0.0.14 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 48.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 52.2ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:46 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > failed due to a > > successrate of only 0% > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:49 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:50 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK with a > > successrate of 80% and an average roundtriptime of 60.3ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK with a > > successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 34ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with a > successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with > a successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 32ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with > a successrate > > of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 24ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:58 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed due to a > > successrate of only 0% > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: The Wirefree Network > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:20 PM > > Subject: RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > > > A common factor keeps coming up here..the 1000 hr. Hmmm..mine went > > down this morning at 10:20 am. Yesterday it went down at 9:45 am. > > The day before at 10:05 am. > > > > Hmmmmm...I seem to remember other folks mentioning the same time > > frame. > > > > Like I said earlier.this may not be an overall temperature > exceeding a > > certain threshold thing.it may be a temperature SWING > thing. In other > > words, maybe when the unit goes from 70 degrees to 80 > degrees in just > > 15 minutes, it craps?? I don't know.but this is very odd. > > > > I can say this though..my network has very little traffic > at 10:00 am. > > > > Sully > > > > P.S. I powered it down for 10 minutes and it has been working fine > > since. So.if it was an overall temperature thing.then why does it > > stay up for the rest of the day, with it getting even > hotter??? This > > is where I would focus, if I were an sB engineer!! > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Bounds > > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:10 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > > > I replaced a 2 week old APPO last night that was exhibiting > the "lost > > association" problem. The new APPO I used as the > replacement came from > > the same order I got from Electro-Comm. This new unit worked > > sporadically last night but this morning around 10 am lost > all signs > > of life. > > > > Also we purchased 3 ABO's during the same time frame. One died > > completely and the other two are disassociating every evening about > > the same time. > > > > So, were ohhh for five on those 'June' units. > > > > Bobby Bounds > > Airwave Internet, LLC > > > > > > > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > > unsubscribe smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type > subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
