Nagios is Opensource, and free. Scott
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 8:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate What about Nagios? We use Nagios and I don't recall that we paid for it. it sends a page to my cell phone. George Ray wrote: > I've been using this www.demarc.com <http://www.demarc.com> It > includes Snort intrusion detection. Ray > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Kevin Summers <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2003 3:20 PM > *Subject:* RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > What are you using for paging? I've been looking for a good > solution for that... > > Kevin Summers > KISTech Internet Services Inc. > www.kistech.com <http://www.kistech.com> > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Blazen > Wireless > *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2003 2:54 PM > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *Subject:* Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > Mine pages me too I got tired of all the pages so I shut that > off! > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* The Wirefree Network <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2003 2:06 PM > *Subject:* RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > Now isn't this a bit TOOOOOO coincidental?!?!? I mentioned > 10:20 am on mine. However, that is when IPCheck paged me > to tell me. When I checked my log, it actually went down > at 10:15.30 Pacific Standard Time. > > Anyone else go down at the same time??? > > Sully > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of > *Blazen Wireless > *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2003 12:41 PM > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Subject:* Re: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > I mentioned at around 9-10:30am that a few went offline I > can check my logs from today I think they both crapped out > at about 10:15 today.. > > Here ar my logs sorry it was soo long but you can see the > times quite clearly when the 10.0.0.98 unit went down and > it is still down no moatter how many times I try to ping > it or reboot the APPO it is supposed to associate to.. it > was good all night then at around 10:14PT 10.0.0.98 it > went down > > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:07 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 52.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 44ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:08 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 34ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 64.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:09 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 26ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 32ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:10 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:11 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:12 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with > a successrate of 80% and an average roundtriptime of 27.5ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:12 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:09:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 34ms > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:04 AM Check cycle starts ( 0- 1) > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 46ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:05 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 40ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 44.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:06 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > failed due to a successrate of only 0% > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:12 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 36ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 36.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:13 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 48ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:14 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed > due to a successrate of only 0% > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:20 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:14:25 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > failed due to a successrate of only 0% > > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Check cycle starts ( 1- 2) > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:20 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 46.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:21 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:27 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > failed due to a successrate of only 0% > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 42.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:30 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 36ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 28ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:31 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 36.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:32 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:33 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with > a successrate of 80% and an average roundtriptime of 30ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:33 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:15:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed > due to a successrate of only 0% > > > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Check cycle starts ( 2- 3) > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.12 OK with > a success of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 42ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:39 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 10.0.0.14 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 48.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.107 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 52.2ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:40 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:46 AM Ping 66.80.227.98 > failed due to a successrate of only 0% > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:49 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:50 AM Ping 66.80.227.99 OK > with a successrate of 80% and an average roundtriptime of > 60.3ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 66.80.227.90 OK > with a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of > 34ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:51 AM Ping 10.0.0.8 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 26ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.76 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 32ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.60 OK with > a successrate of 100% and an average roundtriptime of 24ms > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:52 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 > Monday, August 25, 2003 10:17:58 AM Ping 10.0.0.98 failed > due to a successrate of only 0% > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* The Wirefree Network > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2003 12:20 PM > > *Subject:* RE: [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > A common factor keeps coming up here..the 1000 hr. > Hmmm..mine went down this morning at 10:20 am. > Yesterday it went down at 9:45 am. The day before at > 10:05 am. > > Hmmmmm...I seem to remember other folks mentioning the > same time frame. > > Like I said earlier.this may not be an overall > temperature exceeding a certain threshold thing.it may > be a temperature SWING thing. In other words, maybe > when the unit goes from 70 degrees to 80 degrees in > just 15 minutes, it craps?? I don't know.but this is > very odd. > > I can say this though..my network has very little > traffic at 10:00 am. > > Sully > > *P.S. I powered it down for 10 minutes and it has been > working fine since. So.if it was an overall > temperature thing.then why does it stay up for the > rest of the day, with it getting even hotter??? This > is where I would focus, if I were an sB engineer!!* > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of > *Bobby Bounds > *Sent:* Monday, August 25, 2003 12:10 PM > *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Subject:* [smartBridges] 100% Failure Rate > > I replaced a 2 week old APPO last night that was > exhibiting the "lost association" problem. The new > APPO I used as the replacement came from the same > order I got from Electro-Comm. This new unit worked > sporadically last night but this morning around 10 am > lost all signs of life. > > Also we purchased 3 ABO's during the same time frame. > One died completely and the other two are > disassociating every evening about the same time. > > So, were ohhh for five on those 'June' units. > > Bobby Bounds > > Airwave Internet, LLC > ANNOUNCEMENT WISPCON IV - Can You Ping Me Now? Good! October 27-29, 2003 - Dallas Texas http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm WISP 101 Boot Camp September 29-October 3, 2003 - Chicago, Illinois http://www.part-15.org/train/wisp/101.html The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org ANNOUNCEMENT WISPCON IV - Can You Ping Me Now? Good! October 27-29, 2003 - Dallas Texas http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm WISP 101 Boot Camp September 29-October 3, 2003 - Chicago, Illinois http://www.part-15.org/train/wisp/101.html The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
