@ramirez We couldn’t update well yet as we had to wait until a new server with 
enough capacity was in the same Datacenter to move/migrate machines over. We 
will do this in the coming two weeks as the new machine was just installed on 
the 25th.
@ Joshua Good to know about the swap … right now its still 64G, so the value 
before the upgrade

Once the live machines are migrated we will keep this machine running in the 
exact same state. Then we will perform a few tests. The test should consist of 
these steps (If anybody would like to chime in as far as a preferred order 
those comments are welcome):

1) Perform Tests without changes (logging values from arcstat etc as defined 
earlier)
2) Increase Swap – Redo Tests
3) Upgrade OS – Redo Tests
4) Limit ARC MAX  with /etc/system (we might need help here to speed this up) – 
Redo Tests

Now redoing the tests will require us to write a few load test scripts or 
mirror user load from the live system to this server. Otherwise the  ARC usage 
might not go up the same way.

From: Humberto Ramirez
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 17:28
To: smartos-disc...@lists.smartos.org
Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] ZFS ARC MAX ?

You are you running the release from February of this year, given that SmartOS 
is so simple to upgrade have you considered it?


On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Matthias Götzke <mgt...@gmail.com> wrote:
This behavior is on 20150219T102159Z with 64GB RAM 
SuperMicro
 
"Product": "X9DRD-7LN4F(-JBOD)/X9DRD-EF",
"CPU Type": "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz",
"CPU Physical Cores": 1,
"CPU Total Cores": 16
 
We upgraded the RAM to 128GB now but this problem will obviously happen again 
when we cannot limit the ARC. I am considering starting a few dummy kvm’s with 
reserved RAM as buffers.
 
NOTE: This is a dual CPU Board, with only 1 Socket used and only the RAM from 
that one socket filled. As demand increases we will likely add more RAM and 
another CPU.
 
PS: I did hear that zfs_arc_max can be configured during boot using /etc/system 
but the process to actually change that at boot is not documented in a SOP kind 
of way, so I will have to experiment a bit to get this reliably working on a 
test machine first.
 
 

From: Joshua M. Clulow
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 23:39
To: Matthias Götzke
Subject: Re: [smartos-discuss] ZFS ARC MAX ?
 
On 29 December 2015 at 13:42, Matthias Götzke <mgt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is readjusting, just halting the entire server , making it unreachable
> while it’s doing so. And taking considerably longer doing so than just
> rebooting. That means to me that it’s not just releasing ram pages marked as
> non dirty (that should be faster).
 
I believe we have seen a number of similar problems, where the process
of ARC eviction was hurting system responsiveness.  For example,
OS-4949:
 
   https://smartos.org/bugview/OS-4949
 
What platform version are you running on the systems that become unresponsive?
 
 
Cheers.
 
-- 
Joshua M. Clulow
UNIX Admin/Developer
http://blog.sysmgr.org
 

smartos-discuss | Archives | Modify Your Subscription





-------------------------------------------
smartos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to