Liane Praza wrote: > David Bustos wrote: >> Quoth Liane Praza on Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:40:04PM -0700: >>> David Bustos wrote: >>>> Quoth Liane Praza on Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 12:34:53PM -0700: >>>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~lianep/webrev-20080822/ >>>> lib/libscf/common/scf_tmpl.c > >>>> 3479: Why isn't this SCF_ERROR_TEMPLATE_INVALID? >>> Because it's defined not to be. Seemed like the most flexible >>> definition and is carried throughout its companion functions in the >>> manpage and the function comments. >> Ok, maybe I don't understand. Is there a way to create a property >> template through the manifest which does not have an >> SCF_PROPERTY_TM_TYPE property? > > Sorry, thought I was looking at pg_type. I'll fix.
Wait, no I won't. (Thanks to Antonello for noticing it's inappropriate.) The property type is absolutely not required in the prop pattern definition. That's why it's NOT_FOUND, which was my original point. liane
