Quoth Liane Praza on Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:18:40PM -0700:
> David Bustos wrote:
> >Doesn't it indicate that the repository is corrupt?  Sure, most clients
> >may choose to ignore that, but I don't think we should prevent those
> >capable of notifying the user.  Unless there's some other function to
> >detect corruption.
> 
> "Corrupt" isn't the word I'd use.  It does has some vaguely odd property 
> groups.

Well maybe I don't understand.  How can this happen?  Do supported
operations lead to this situation?  Does the state confuse any other
operations?


David

Reply via email to