> I think a low/medium priority bug is in order for the startd change.  As 
 > always, I wish UV wasn't in the situation of having to do this at all, 
 > and would prefer to continue giving priority to the early-import effort 
 > so that future super-early-boot service changes can avoid having to do 
 > any work at all in this scenario.

Indeed.

-- 
meem

Reply via email to