Quoth Liane Praza on Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:04:57AM -0700: > David Bustos writes: > > By my reading of the 04:54, 5 February 2007 version of the > > constitution, a vote on the facilitator isn't required -- the OGB can > > appoint whomever they want. Am I mistaken? > > They can, but are choosing not to. They suggest (in discussion on > ogb-discuss) that communities should nominate their own faciliators, > and are delinquent if they have not done so. > > I am attempting to rectify that situation for this community.
Well you're a core contributor. Is your nomination (of yourself) not sufficient? I don't see why we have to vote. And why wasn't a facilitator appointed when we were initiated? I assume it's because we were grandfathered in, but I don't see any grandfathering language in the constitution or an OGB policy or guidance statement. David
