On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:17:36PM -0700, Liane Praza wrote: > I will note that the OGB has chosen to be hands-off and not actually > create policy around everything. Guidance is offered on their > discussion list, which is why I referred you there. (Of course, you can > always choose to try to influence the OGB, if more concrete policies to > follow are important to you.)
We could issue a simply-worded piece of guidance to the effect that grandfathered Groups are expected to nominate a Facilitator, and the OGB will generally defer to their choices. I'll raise it on ogb-discuss and try to get it approved at the next meeting. But yes, we're trying to leave people alone to work as they choose. > Communities have a great deal of freedom to govern their community as > they want, and I guess I really do hope this community will choose to > operate around determining internal consensus and then communicating it > to external entities. That's why I was seeking consensus on a > facilitator choice. That's my hope as well. Stuff like this should take the minimal possible time and then everyone can get back to writing code. Including the OGB members. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!"
