Rainer Heilke wrote: > While I do not think the categories (nor my placement in them) are > entirely accurate
OK. My mistake. , and also miss the grammatical argument, I do agree > that the current proposal, as written, is of dubious value and may as > well be closed. Then you're in support of Mark's proposed way forward? (I am. I'd like to see a way forward that involves the small set of interested parties be able to report back to the larger aliases with an updated proposal. The current conversation doesn't seem to be converging on a concise updated proposal, so I'm not sure that continuing it on this large alias is helpful. There's a reasonably small set of folks who are passionate about this as shown by continuing to participate in the discussion, so it'd be good to see us discuss it offline and either come up with a unified proposal, or at least a set of clear competing proposals the larger group could then provide feedback on.) liane
