B J Wahl writes: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 03:00:42PM -0700, Gary Winiger wrote: > > > > > I'd appreciate review of my changes for > > > > > > > > > > PSARC 2007/177 SMF read-protected property storage > > > > > > > > Have you coordinated with Tom Whitten to ensure the auditing > > > > changes specified in PSARC 2007/177 are implemented. > > > > Skimming your webrev, I don't see any audit stuff. > > > > > > I've read an early version of his changes, but as far as I can tell > > > they aren't in the gate. Tom, is your putback imminent? > > > > I thought Tom was quite close -- perhaps other things have popped up. > > I know I've not see the "final" audit records for review. > > 2007/177 isn't technically complete without audit. > > Tom is very close, about a week or so out, from putback. He's > not in the office today, but will be able to give you a more > exact estimate on Monday.
I'm close, but putback is probably more than a week out. Here are the exact details on where I stand. Awhile back, I received extensive webrev comments from Davaid Bustos. Last week I completed the code on all of those changes plus some more modest changes that Gary suggested. These changes pass the audit tests that I have, but I have not yet run the more extensive SMF test suite. I will start running the SMF test suite today, but it will take 2 or 3 days to complete. Once the test suite is done, I know that David will want to review the changes that I made, since there were quite a number of them. Keith, I'll take a look at your changes today and get back to you. I'll also prepare a webrev of my code as it stands now and send you a pointer to it. Gary, I'll send you the "final" audit records tomorrow. tom
