On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:31:16AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > I thought so too, but, looking at it more carefully I see that iCalendar > is geared around tasks to be performed by humans (and non-task items > too), and as such solves one problem (time/recurrence specification) > that we need solved here, and others that we don't (e.g., free/busy > time).
Actually, I missed ACTION:PROCEDURE + attachment for VALARMs. > > Problem 2: Where to put the shell script? > > Right, iCalendar provides for attachments, which is where a > script/program can live (or it could live in a comment property, or we > could extend iCalendar if need be). Of course, some sort of convention > will be necessary. So no convention nor extension will be necessary.
