Hi Alok Just the fact that I was able to write a handler for my Wavecom to fix a few very well documented issues that the new models have with the USB port, doesn't convert me in an expert on this area. My handler is in fact the old and well know default handler for Wavecom with a very few modifications that were causing my modem to hand in certain circumstances when I attached it with an USB port, and they were even well documented.
Don't ever waste your time getting the specification that I put in my older post, It is useless for you. This specification contains the standard AT commands and the propietary AT commands supported by Wavecom industrial modems, which doesn't mean that they are supported in your Samsung Corby. As a general rule: forget about mobile phones, at least in my experience they are completely useless, and I don't thing that you are going to be able to find the documentation for the modem of this phone, and even if you are able to, It is a lot of work to get it working. Go instead for an industrial device. I did a few tries with a samsung c3300k, and the modem of this phone should be almost the same as the one as your corby. The result is that in some very well know, standard and documented AT commands the modem just doesn't provide any response at all. If you are still interested on my handler, as T. Delenikas told in a previous post, It is already part of the repository. Best regards. Marcos. On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:22 AM, alok vaidya <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > Would you be able to pass me over the handler code that you wrote, so that > I could take a look at it since I am planning I would have to do something > similar. The issue is I am not being to communicated with any of my three > modems with the ReadMessages or the SendMessage programs. I tried using my > Phone Samsung Corby Pro (B5310), A GSM/GPRS modem that I have Proliifc > Technologies' PL2303 and had no luck. On reading some of the posts on the > mailing list I found out that Wavecom/Sierra Wireless modem work most > smoothly with the lib so I went ahead and bought a Wavecom Q2403 but that > seems not to be working too. > > I am trying to download the AT Command document you have referred to in one > of your posts, but the download seems to stopping mid-way everytime, so if > you can attache that too or mention another link it would be great. > > If you want the details of the issues I am facing, you can take a look at > the topic "Issues while using SMSlib" posted by me. > Here's a link to it: > http://groups.google.com/group/smslib/browse_thread/thread/20f5bdf2f6cb10a2 > > Regards, > Alok. > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Marcos Truchado < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> The way that the Wavecom modem handle the AT commands is almost identical >> in in both the old and the new ones. I noticed that a few AT commands were >> hanging the modem and you need to do a hard reset to set the modem back to >> accept AT commands. To avoid that, I used the official Wavecom specification >> sheet to build a new handler to support this functionality, and It is >> working and will be part in the future release of SMSLib as far as I know >> because a previous discussion I had with T.Delenikas. When?, I don't know. >> >> Please note that this limitation, according to the official Wavecom spec, >> only appears when you use one of the new models via an USB connection. Using >> the d-sub 15 pin connection should not end with those issues, therefore my >> handler is not required and you can safety use the generic one for Wavecom. >> >> I was able to use my old motorola L6 with SMSLib in the meantime that I >> was trying to get my FXT009 handler to work, and It works fantastic, but the >> problem is that this modem was laying in a box for at least 3 years, so I >> don't think you can be able of buying a new one. >> >> As I said, I had a really good experience with Wavecom, the specs are easy >> to find, the AT command support list is quite standard and It works, at >> least for me, perfect. IMHO this is the way to go. >> >> Best regards. >> >> Marcos. >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:53 PM, [email protected] <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Dear Marcos, >>> >>> Thank you for all of the information! >>> >>> Unfortunately I do not want to use something that is not officially >>> supported yet, just in case any issue's arise while using this modem. >>> I will definitely keep that model on the list of possibilities once >>> the new 3.5.1 SMSLib is released. Do you know when this version may >>> be released? >>> >>> Lastly, are there any other USB Modems that are fully compatible with >>> the current version? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> On Oct 24, 8:53 am, Marcos Truchado <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hi: >>> > >>> > It is a Sierra wireless FXT009 >>> > >>> > http://www.sierrawireless.com/Support/Downloads/AirLink/Programmable_. >>> .. >>> > >>> > Currently I'm developing an application using it. With the latest 3.5.1 >>> > version of SMSLib this modem is not supported. However I was able to >>> create >>> > a handler that works perfectly. I contact with T. Delenikas and I sent >>> him >>> > the full project and he told me that this handler will be included in a >>> > future release of SMSLib, so expect it to be soon released, or if you >>> are on >>> > a hurry I can send to you a modified version of the 3.5.1 with the >>> handler >>> > included that supports this modem. The handler I wrote also should be >>> > compatible with the FXT002, but I don't have this modem so I can't say. >>> > >>> > Best regards. >>> > >>> > Marcos. >>> > >>> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 2:48 PM, [email protected] < >>> [email protected]>wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > Hello Marcos, >>> > >>> > > Thank you for the information, which model modem did you purchase? >>> > > And was it a Wavecom modem or a Sierra Wireless model modem? >>> > >>> > > Thanks again, >>> > >>> > > Matt >>> > >>> > > On Oct 19, 3:29 pm, Marcos Truchado <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > Hi: >>> > >>> > > > Go for Wavecom. I had the same problem that you, and finally I >>> bought one >>> > > > Wavecom (as you said manufactured now by sierra wireless) and It is >>> > > working >>> > > > perfectly with SMSLib. >>> > >>> > > > Best regards. >>> > >>> > > > Marcos. >>> > >>> > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:27 PM, [email protected] < >>> > > [email protected]>wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > Hello, >>> > >>> > > > > Does anyone have a more updated list of USB (not RS232 Serial) >>> GSM >>> > > > > Modems that are compatible with SMSLib? >>> > >>> > > > > The current list, seen here:http://smslib.org/doc/compatibility/, >>> is >>> > > > > very outdated, for example, I know Wavecom has since been bought >>> out >>> > > > > by Sierra Wireless, so do any of their USB GSM Modem's work with >>> > > > > SMSLib without error's? >>> > >>> > > > > If no one has an updated list, what would be a good recommended >>> USB >>> > > > > GSM Modem to use with SMSLib? >>> > >>> > > > > Thanks in adv. >>> > >>> > > > > --Matt >>> > >>> > > > > -- >>> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>> Google >>> > > Groups >>> > > > > "SMSLib Discussion Group" group. >>> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > > > > [email protected]. >>> > > > > For more options, visit this group at >>> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en. >>> > >>> > > -- >>> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups >>> > > "SMSLib Discussion Group" group. >>> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> > > [email protected]. >>> > > For more options, visit this group at >>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "SMSLib Discussion Group" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en. >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "SMSLib Discussion Group" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "SMSLib Discussion Group" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SMSLib Discussion Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smslib?hl=en.
