Closed and offers. You never know, I might want to take an offer up
one day, but I'm never going to want to search archives beyond what I
can do in gmail anyway.

--stuart

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Ray Packham <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Not worried CLOSE IT .....
> Ray
>
>
> On Thursday, February 26, 2009, at 08:54PM, "Jason Davies" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>Returning to something I was looking into, I had closed off the
>>archives so we could have offers from MUG groups which are not
>>intended to be open to the 'general public'. Some of the
>>rationale for that is that MUG groups often pay membership fees
>>(which we don't) and are therefore a 'more exclusive set.'
>>
>>I'm inclined to keep the archives closed because
>>
>>a) there seems to have been interest in offers as a result of
>>the spat yesterday
>>b) I don't think the SMUG archives are particularly a source of
>>unrepeated tips for the wider community (no offence, but it's
>>not Apple's Applescript list)
>>
>>Part of the arrangement for receiving offers is that they only
>>go to MUG members, not to the world in general. Since joining is
>>pretty easy, it's not a serious bar to access.
>>
>>So I would prefer to close the archives and post the occasional
>>MUG offers. Tom voted against. Can we do a quick check of
>>opinions for closing (and receiving offers) or opening (and not
>>receiving offers)?
>>
>>I'd rather just have votes rather than complex discussion so we
>>can make a quick decision. Shall we say 'polling' closes
>>midnight Saturday?
>>
>>It's currently tied, me for closing, Tom for opening:-)
>>
>>Tom Coady wrote on 22/12/08 at 12:28
>>
>>>On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Jason Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In order to be able to post these I've had to make the archives
>>>>inaccessible to non-members. If anyone violently disagrees with
>>>>that, please say so - but it will make posting these offers very difficult!
>>>
>>>
>>>I object, but only mildly, because
>>>
>>>- you could post this to a group page which by default tells non-members
>>>"*You cannot view the group's content or participate in the group because
>>>you are not currently a member. * *Members must be approved before
>>>joining."*
>>>- At least one reason for switching to groups was to open the archive
>>>resource to the "community"
>>>- I've never seen anything of interest in these offers which look more
>>>like spam to me, ymmv
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Sussex Mac User Group" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to