Nicholas Holt wrote on 26/8/09 at 17:45 >Its probably in the licence that one agrees to but (I'm guessing here) >I'm probably not alone in admitting I've never read one.
before we get too informal, I should put my list-mom hat on. And tell myself off, first and foremost. I'm not going to look up the User Agreement right now but I am certain it says you are limited to installing on machines you use personally. It may even say one machine. My point in saying that Apple don't seem to check was part of an argument that, despite the apparent absence of draconian measures, they offer a reasonable 5-licence household pack and that in the case of Snow Leopard, *not* buying the requisite number of licences seems rather petty, given its price. The absence of legal measures seems to me not an oversight or invitation to break the licence agreement but rather an invitation to rise above the kind of petty and troublesome suspicion that Windows seems to have by being trustworthy and buying the right number of licences. That's the list admin's public and personal position and I'm spelling it out in case I seemed to be encouraging people not to buy enough licences (I was never arguing that). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
