Windows 7 compatability is the top of their key notes for this release. I agree about the price although as I said before I do think they have made big improvements since version 3.
----------------------- Chris Staples On 29 Nov 2009, at 18:20, BlacksTTer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Interesting. I have Parallels 4.0 on my MacPRo, but have never used > it. I had problems getting it to load my Vista DVD...so eventually > gave up.... > I dont see how Pralleles can expect us to stump up an extra £30.00, > expecially when Snow Leopard only costs £29.00!!! > > btw...does v5.0 work with WIndows 7? > > On 29 Nov, 11:48, Chris Staples <[email protected]> wrote: >> I know it costs but I have recently upgraded 2 machines to >> Parallels 5 >> and so far have found it more stable and far better integrated with >> the Mac OS (both machines on latest Mac system). I had a number of >> irritating niggles using Parallels 3, nothing serious but annoying >> none the less and I would recommend the upgrade as good value if you >> use it every day (as I do). >> >> Chris >> >> On 29 Nov 2009, at 10:36, Rob Beattie wrote: >> >> >> >>> 2009/11/29 Phil Tomlinson <[email protected]>: >> >>>> I don't think that anyone else has pointed this out, but if you >>>> upgrade to Snow L then your old version of Parallels (3.0) doesn't >>>> work and you have to shell out £30 plus to get an upgrade. I >>>> checked online and using Snow Checker before I upgraded but nowhere >>>> did I see this information before I installed SL! > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
