Both Parallels and Fusion are very good - I have used both and eventually settled on Fusion, because at the time it was the only one with 64 bit support. I think both have 64 bit support now, so that's no longer an issue. I think you'll be happy whichever one you pick.
Paul On 20 Jan 2010, at 08:23, BrianJTerry wrote: > I have been happily running a number of key applications which require > windows using virtualbox.. I have not found acceptable Mac replacements. > Parallels or Fusuion appear to be more flexible. I am attracted by the > ability to access my application from within mac os without having to enter a > virual machine. > Has anybody got any views on which is the best? >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sussex Mac User Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/smug?hl=en-GB.
