Trust me, you want *that* specific "Part" dead as well! :-) This is not the snapcraft concept you're thinking of. On Mar 10, 2016 6:49 PM, "Mark Shuttleworth" <m...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On 10/03/16 06:33, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > > -- Part > > > > This term as previously discussed was one of the types that were used to > > refer to snaps. Let's use Snap or SnapInfo where appropriate. > > No, there's is a big difference between a snap and a part. > > A snap is made of parts, but a part is not a whole snap. > > We want parts to be an independent concept (much like the new "layers" > in charms) because they are points of collaboration between parties with > a common interest, that still let those parties reuse those shared bits > inside unique snaps. > > Mark > >
-- snappy-devel mailing list snappy-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
