Ah. Historical guts of snappy, huh :) Thank you :) On 10/03/16 13:52, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > Trust me, you want *that* specific "Part" dead as well! :-) > > This is not the snapcraft concept you're thinking of. > On Mar 10, 2016 6:49 PM, "Mark Shuttleworth" <m...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > >> On 10/03/16 06:33, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: >>> -- Part >>> >>> This term as previously discussed was one of the types that were used to >>> refer to snaps. Let's use Snap or SnapInfo where appropriate. >> No, there's is a big difference between a snap and a part. >> >> A snap is made of parts, but a part is not a whole snap. >> >> We want parts to be an independent concept (much like the new "layers" >> in charms) because they are points of collaboration between parties with >> a common interest, that still let those parties reuse those shared bits >> inside unique snaps. >> >> Mark >> >>
-- snappy-devel mailing list snappy-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
