Then again, maybe not.  The defense has evidence they claim is DNA evidence of other men within the same time frame as Bryant.  Who is to say it wasn't one of the other men roughing her up?  Sounds like reasonable doubt to me.
 
Charles Mims
http://www.the-sandbox.org
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 2:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Breaking on the news...

In a message dated 10/10/2003 3:40:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I guess... I didn't expect her to say the girls name 4-6
times in the pre trial... or mention how she may have
had sex three times in three days or whatever.  I guess
I was hoping that all the blows, on either side, would at
least be above the belt.  The judge is going to have to
get control of this thing.  If the defense can't conduct
themselves in a civilized court room manner.... How
the heck am I going to defend *them*  when Jackie
gets on a rant?   <G>



LOL   you may actually have to agree with me    maybe the end of the world is coming huh tim?  lol
________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to