Thanks Charles.....
Yeah... that is what I figured... the girl is a slut and is holding
a rich basket ball player ransom for the money... <G>
On Saturday, October 11, 2003, at 08:28 AM, Charles wrote:
Then again, maybe not.� The defense has evidence they claim is DNA evidence of other men within the same time frame as Bryant.� Who is to say it wasn't one of the other men roughing her up?� Sounds like reasonable doubt to me.<image.tiff>
�
Charles Mims
http://www.the-sandbox.org
�
�
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 2:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Sndbox] Breaking on the news...
In a message dated 10/10/2003 3:40:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess... I didn't expect her to say the girls name 4-6
times in the pre trial... or mention how she may have
had sex three times in three days or whatever.� I guess
I was hoping that all the blows, on either side, would at
least be above the belt.� The judge is going to have to
get control of this thing.� If the defense can't conduct
themselves in a civilized court room manner.... How
the heck am I going to defend *them*� when Jackie
gets on a rant?�� <G>
LOL�� you may actually have to agree with me��� maybe the end of the world is coming huh tim?� lol________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
________________________________
Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net
