Well why do they feel it shouldn't be brought into play yet. Why waste the
tax payers money on a trial if there doesn't need to be one.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:03 AM
To: 'The Sandbox Discussion List'
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Breaking...


When it comes to trial.  The defense is not allowed to present evidence in a
prelim.  They can cross examine, but not present new evidence.  That's what
the prosecution is all upset about.  They say the questioning brought into
evidence that shouldn't be brought into play yet.  BUT, it is evidence that
makes the prosecution look as if they are trying to hang it on Kobe instead
of looking for the unidentified male whose fluids were actually in the
woman's panties.


Charles Mims
http://www.the-sandbox.org


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Angela
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:53 AM
To: The Sandbox Discussion List
Subject: RE: [Sndbox] Breaking...

When does the defense start presenting stuff?





________________________________

Changes to your subscription (unsubs, nomail, digest) can be made by going to 
http://sandboxmail.net/mailman/listinfo/sndbox_sandboxmail.net 

Reply via email to