On Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 2:06:22 AM, Landry wrote: LW> I have seen a fairly substantial increase on false positives LW> today.� I have submitted several FPs to the false@ address.� Has LW> there been a big change in the core rulebase today?� I wouldn't LW> think that upgrading to the new code this morning would cause LW> this, would it?
No, the upgrade should not have this effect. It appears that a number of secondary services we reference have had problems recently such as SORBS and SURBL. I've been pushing false processing to mitigate the problems quickly, we are adjusting our tuning parameters for candidate generation, and will continue to monitor conditions closely. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
