Hi Pete,
I implemented the identifier option. Thanks for the advice. I've also finally
seen an email where spamassassin is acknowledging some input from SNF.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=14.214 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6
tests=[BAYES_95=3, KB_DATE_CONTAINS_TAB=2.751,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449,
RCVD_IN_XBL=0.375, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SNF4SA=4.000, TAB_IN_FROM=0.499]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
That is mostly what I'm looking for, but the identifier option will be helpful
for debugging.
Thanks again for all your help!
Daniel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete McNeil" <[email protected]>
To: "Message Sniffer Community" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:20:31 AM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Adding Message Sniffer to Zimbra
Unfortunately, some implementations of SA are hiding these headers.
We've seen this a few times recently. There doesn't seem to be a way
around it outside of hacking SA itself. (A few people have done that,...
but it was ugly).
If you want to be able to more easily associate SNF logs with messages
you might consider changing SNF's message identifier to use the Message ID.
http://www.armresearch.com/Documentation/QA/ltidentifiergt-2021367617.jsp
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <[email protected]>.
This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
Send administrative queries to <[email protected]>
