Original message: ...To level the playing field and to reward players for not being prepared, less skilled or less practiced... ========================= At first glance it appears to do that. But if you think about how this would have worked at contests you have attended, you might conclude that the overall effect is to introduce arbitrariness and quirky results into the scoring, with no corresponding benefit. It's purely a landing contest for the maxers; a guy who gets a near-max will have the door slammed on him with no chance to recover; and the guys who would have been at the bottom with conventional scoring will still be at the bottom.
- RE: [RCSE] Contest Format Daryl Perkins
- RE: [RCSE] Contest Format Tim Bennett
- Re: [RCSE] Contest Format Mark Triebes
- RE: [RCSE] Contest Format Tim Bennett
- Re: [RCSE] Contest format tony estep
- RE: [RCSE] Contest format Tim Bennett
- [RCSE] Contest format tony estep
- Re: [RCSE] Contest Format Joe Rodriguez
- Re: [RCSE] Contest Format David Klein
- [RCSE] Contest Format john cyr
- [RCSE] Contest Format tony estep
- Re: [RCSE] Contest Format LJolly
- RE: [RCSE] Contest Format chris
- RE: [RCSE] Contest Format Jim Monaco
- Re: [RCSE] Contest Format Jeff Steifel
- Re: [RCSE] Contest Format Jeff Steifel
- [RCSE] Contest Format tony estep
- RE: [RCSE] Contest Format chris
- RE: [RCSE] Contest Format chris
- Re: [RCSE] Contest Format Jeff Steifel
- [RCSE] Contest Format Hank Schorz

