David, Are you sure?
My impression is that end point adjustment limits the servo travel at full stick movement, but that the control movement remains proportional to the stick movement throughout the range. Therefore, you will still get differential aileron movement throughout the full range of stick movement. I have used both methods successfully. There are some circumstances, at least on a JR388s which I believe is very similar to the 8103, where you must use the end point method. For example, if you want to use the free mixers to give a different amount of differential for launch or landing, then the differential for normal flight should be set with the end point adjustment. ******************************************** Ian Roach Kiama, NSW Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 61 2 4232 1775 ******************************************** > -----Original Message----- > From: targetdrone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 1 July 2003 11:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [RCSE] programing 8103 differential ailerons > > > Differential. This helps correct the adverse yaw effect. Using end point > adjustment for your differential would only correct adverse yaw at full > aileron deflection. > > David Judson > (using a 10X and loving it) > RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.
