|
Just a cheap shot, could not resist, blame Gordy for his endless
overstated hype about everything and anything. Anything good,
and I assume the Shadow is, will out perform a Hitec or FMA rx,
apples to oranges indeed. That was the point of my comment not that it is tiny
or light. The new technology available will be a great
advantage especially for the micro pilot, or someone looking for features like
this, as far as using two three or four ganged up for a giant scale ship
however,( as stated by some, and of interest to others who might use this rx.)
my communications with Mr. Arroosh Elahi have been inconclusive as to what if any range degradation
you might get putting two or more rxs in one plane. TOC
pilots tried this a long time ago with large aerobatic ships with the result
that there was often significant range reduction with using two rxs in one aircraft due to the antennas somehow interfering
with each other. This both with Futaba and JR rxs. I offered to test two in a plane but have not heard
back. If some one would kindly perform a simple range check with two rxs or more in a large aircraft, with antennas running parallel
inside the fuselage. or send me two to test, I will gladly pay for them ,and
send them back for a refund after testing on the ground, not flying, The
comment I got from Mr. Elahi was that tests were “pretty
good”, but they had not the chance yet to go out and fly much until the
weather improved... If these little rxs
indeed perform with unhindered range (ganged up) as compared to a single 10
channel PCM rx (original
branded equipment) then it would be an interesting development for giant scale
applications. Synth tuning is not a feature that is critical other than convenience, and for the
average pilot, not so necessary. I travel with several modules and xtals that serve my purposes very well, the real issue is
all the other performance data. The stuff that keeps your
plane in the air. JD -----Original Message-----
Yes, but
is the JR standard PCM rx synthesized? Does it weigh 8 gms?
Somehow, I doubt it.
|
- RE: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3 John Derstine
- Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3 Simon Van Leeuwen
- RE: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3 John Derstine
- Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3 Simon Van Leeuwen
- RE: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shado... John Derstine
- Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - ... Simon Van Leeuwen
- Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3 Chuck Anderson
- Re: [RCSE] Re: Soaring V1 #5375 - Shadow 3 Simon Van Leeuwen

